Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment: Perioperative death and strokes
It is very uncertain whether very early cerebral revascularization changes stroke and Death < 30 days compared with delayed treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment Stroke and Death < 30 days · people with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis It is very uncertain whether very early cerebral revascularization changes stroke and Death < 30 days compared with delayed treatment (very low certainty). Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3.3 [0.4, 29.2] | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low |
Very early cerebral revascularization vs delayed treatment Perioperative death and strokes · people with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis It is very uncertain whether very early cerebral revascularization changes perioperative death and strokes compared with delayed treatment (very low certainty). Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.5 [0.1, 1.6] | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.