evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

40 questions · 41 findings · 8 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 15 · 36.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 12.2%Low 20 · 48.8%Moderate 1 · 2.4%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia vs aphakia

Visual axis opacification · children younger than two years of age with bilateral congenital cataracts

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Pseudophakia changes visual axis opacification compared with aphakia (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Large retro‐equatorial recession of horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus vs simple tenotomy and resuturing of the 4 horizontal rectus muscles

Change in visual recognition times ‐ not reported · infantile nystagmus syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery fee waiver with/without transport provision or reimbursement to improve access to cataract surgical services vs usual care

Surgical outcome (visual acuity in the operated eye) · people with vision impairment caused by cataract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery fee waiver with/without transport provision or reimbursement to improve access to cataract surgical services vs usual care

Prevalence of visual impairment due to cataract · people with vision impairment caused by cataract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Best corrected visual acuity at 2 to 3 months (measured using logMAR scale. A score of 0 = good vision, higher score is worse vision) · people with fungal ulcers
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Fear of falling scores at 6 months Assessed by Short Falls Efficacy Scale‐International · older adults (aged 60 and over) with irreversible visual impairment

The intervention showed no clear difference in fear of falling scores at 6 months Assessed by Short Falls Efficacy… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life at 6 months Assessed by 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey · older adults (aged 60 and over) with irreversible visual impairment

The intervention showed no clear difference in quality of life at 6 months Assessed by 12‐Item Short Form Health… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Physical activity at 6 months Assessed by self‐reported physical activity · older adults (aged 60 and over) with irreversible visual impairment

The intervention showed no clear difference in physical activity at 6 months Assessed by self‐reported physical… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Fear of falling scores at 6 months Assessed by Short Falls Efficacy Scale‐International · older adults (aged 60 and over) with irreversible visual impairment

The intervention showed no clear difference in fear of falling scores at 6 months Assessed by Short Falls Efficacy… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life at 6 months Assessed by European Quality of Life‐15 · older adults (aged 60 and over) with irreversible visual impairment

The intervention showed no clear difference in quality of life at 6 months Assessed by European Quality of Life‐15 (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review