Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

31 questions · 34 findings · 6 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 4 · 11.8%GRADE not reported 2 · 5.9%Very low 13 · 38.2%Low 12 · 35.3%Moderate 2 · 5.9%High 1 · 2.9%

Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual care or no treatment

Functional impairment · adults with post‐traumatic stress or common mental disorders

It is very uncertain whether primary health professional‐led psychological interventions changes functional impairment (1 to 6 months post intervention) Locally… compared with usual or no care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary health professional‐led psychological interventions vs usual care or no treatment

Adverse events (RR > 1 denotes greater risk of harm) · adults with post‐traumatic stress or common mental disorders

It is very uncertain whether primary health professional‐led psychological interventions changes adverse events (RR > 1 denotes greater risk of harm) compared with usual or no care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation interventions vs no intervention

Patient health status: psychological well‐being (GHQ‐12, 0–36, higher score = worse) at up to 6 months · healthcare professionals providing stroke rehabilitation

Implementation interventions showed no clear difference in patient health status: psychological well‐being (GHQ‐12, 0–36,… compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

Psychological functioning and impairment at study endpoint (higher score = higher disability) · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Indicated prevention interventions vs control group

Psychological functioning and impairment at study endpoint (higher score = higher disability) · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions vs control group

Psychological functioning and impairment at study endpoint (higher score = higher disability) · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Caesarean section – for psychological reasons · mixed population (women with a fear of childbirth; women with high levels of anxiety; husbands of pregnant women; pregnant women and…

The intervention showed no clear difference in caesarean section – for psychological reasons (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review