Cochrane · systematic review · CD013779

Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review

Pollock, A, Campbell, P, Cheyne, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2020 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 80%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Workplace intervention compared to no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak

Population: health and social professionals
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
General mental health (critical outcome)
Workplace intervention vs no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Resilience (critical outcome)
Workplace intervention vs no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Psychological symptoms of anxiety, depression or stress
Workplace intervention vs no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Burnout (10 questions from ProQOL scale; assessed immediately post‐intervention and at 6‐month
Workplace intervention vs no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak
no estimate extracted1 study · 408 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Effects on workplace staffing ‐ absenteeism
Workplace intervention vs no intervention to support mental health and resilience of health and social care professionals during a disease outbreak
no estimate extractedNRNo studies