OHSS · stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
It is very uncertain whether natural cycle IVF changes OHSS per woman compared with standard IVF (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
Natural cycle IVF showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy per woman compared with standard IVF (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ongoing pregnancy · stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
Natural cycle IVF showed no clear difference in ongoing pregnancy per woman compared with standard IVF (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Multiple pregnancy rate · stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
It is very uncertain whether natural cycle IVF changes multiple pregnancy per woman compared with standard IVF (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy rate per couple – subgroup IVF · assisted reproduction technology cycles
It is very uncertain whether glucocorticoids changes clinical pregnancy rate per couple – subgroup IVF compared with no glucocorticoids or placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ unselected or unstated IVF number · Subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction
G‐CSF showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy rate ‐ unselected or unstated IVF number compared with no treatment or placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy rate ‐ 2 or more IVF failures · Subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction
G‐CSF may leads to higher clinical pregnancy rate ‐ 2 or more IVF failures compared with no treatment or placebo (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Early embryo transfer ‐ GM501 (specific) versus Sydney IVF (other) · Women in assisted reproductive technology cycles (ART) receiving human pre‐implantation embryos in either early (cleavage stage transfer)…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes early embryo transfer ‐ GM501 (specific) versus Sydney IVF (other) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Early embryo transfer ‐ G2 (specific) versus Universal IVF (other) · Women in assisted reproductive technology cycles (ART) receiving human pre‐implantation embryos in either early (cleavage stage transfer)…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes early embryo transfer ‐ G2 (specific) versus Universal IVF (other) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Early embryo transfer: Cook (K‐SIFM or K‐SICM) (specific) versus Vitrolife (IVF or G3) (other) · Women in assisted reproductive technology cycles (ART) receiving human pre‐implantation embryos in either early (cleavage stage transfer)…
The intervention showed no clear difference in early embryo transfer: Cook (K‐SIFM or K‐SICM) (specific) versus… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Late embryo transfer ‐ GM501 (specific) versus Sydney IVF (other) · Women in assisted reproductive technology cycles (ART) receiving human pre‐implantation embryos in either early (cleavage stage transfer)…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes late embryo transfer ‐ GM501 (specific) versus Sydney IVF (other) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Late embryo transfer ‐ G2 (specific) versus Universal IVF (other) · Women in assisted reproductive technology cycles (ART) receiving human pre‐implantation embryos in either early (cleavage stage transfer)…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes late embryo transfer ‐ G2 (specific) versus Universal IVF (other) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in live birth compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Miscarriage · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in miscarriage compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
It is very uncertain whether ART with seminal plasma changes clinical pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Multiple pregnancy · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ectopic pregnancy · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
It is very uncertain whether ART with seminal plasma changes ectopic pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events, including infectious complications · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Live birth rate per woman · Women undergoing in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection
It is very uncertain whether day 3 changes live birth rate per woman compared with day 2 embryo transfer following IVF or ICSI (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review