Question · asked by 1 review

ART with seminal plasma vs standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer): Multiple pregnancy

ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
ART with seminal plasma vs standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer)
Multiple pregnancy · Women undergoing ART (IVF, ICSI, or frozen embryo transfer)
ART with seminal plasma showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy compared with standard ART (IVF, ICSI, and frozen embryo transfer) (low certainty).
Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.11 [0.76, 1.64]5 studies · 1642 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles (IVF, ICSI and…
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.