Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,018 questions · 3,100 findings · 369 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 774 · 25%GRADE not reported 108 · 3.5%Very low 727 · 23.5%Low 840 · 27.1%Moderate 474 · 15.3%High 177 · 5.7%

Cannabinoid plus other anti‐emetic agent vs other anti‐emetic monotherapy

Withdrawals due to adverse events · people with chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting

It is very uncertain whether cannabinoid plus other anti‐emetic agent changes withdrawal due to adverse event ( compared with other anti‐emetic monotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cannabinoid plus other anti‐emetic agent vs other anti‐emetic monotherapy

Lack of efficacy withdrawal · people with chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting

Cannabinoid plus other anti‐emetic agent showed no clear difference in withdrawal due to lack of efficacy ( compared with other anti‐emetic monotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin

Death from all causes during treatment (range 6 days to 16 days) · acute ischaemic stroke

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in death from all causes during treatment (range 6 days to 16 days) compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin

Death from all causes during · acute ischaemic stroke

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in death from all causes during compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin

Deep vein thrombosis · acute ischaemic stroke

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids may leads to lower deep vein thrombosis during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days) compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin

Pulmonary embolism · acute ischaemic stroke

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in pulmonary embolism during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days) compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin

Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage/haemorrhagic transformation of the cerebral infarct during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days)⁹ · acute ischaemic stroke

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage/haemorrhagic transformation of… compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils vs tailored interventions based on clinical symptoms

Exacerbations · people with asthma

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils probably leads to lower number of participants who had one or more exacerbations over the… compared with tailored interventions based on clinical symptoms (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils vs tailored interventions based on clinical symptoms

Hospital admissions · people with asthma

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils probably leads to lower hospitalisations compared with tailored interventions based on clinical symptoms (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gestrinone vs danazol

Side effects ‐ hot flushes · women with symptomatic endometriosis

It is very uncertain whether gestrinone changes side effects: hot flushes compared with danazol (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review