Question · asked by 1 review

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin: Pulmonary embolism

Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in pulmonary embolism during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days) compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids vs unfractionated heparin
Pulmonary embolism during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days) · acute ischaemic stroke
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids showed no clear difference in pulmonary embolism during treatment period (range 6 days to 16 days) compared with unfractionated heparin (low certainty).
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids versus standard unfractionated heparin for acute ischaemic stroke (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.57 [0.23, 1.41]6 studies · 1250 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Low‐molecular‐weight heparins or heparinoids versus standard unfractionated heparin for acute ischaemic stroke
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.