Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,463 questions in 125 reviews · Anaesthesia

current versions
No studies 197 · 13.5%Ungraded 203 · 13.9%Very low 307 · 21%Low 441 · 30.1%Moderate 245 · 16.7%High 70 · 4.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Success of local anaesthesia (soft tissue, self-reported; 100% success in all studies) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
'Other comparisons with 100% success': IANB - Sampaio 2012 35/35 vs 35/35; Fernandez 2005 39/39 vs 39/39. Both formulations 100% successful; no meta-analysis (no difference).2 studies · 74 participantsUngraded
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition), Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario… · 0-1 minute following needle insertion
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD 4.74 [-1.98, 11.46]3 studies · 157 participantsModerate
0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: paraesthesia following injection · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
4% articaine plain vs 4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine
Speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.03 [-0.66, 0.71]2 studies · 102 participantsVery low
3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Speed of onset of anaesthesia · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
4% prilocaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.91, 1.43]2 studies · 48 participantsLow
3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of healthy pulps, hard and soft tissues) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario… · Not reported (estimated < 2 hours)
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.79, 0.95]2 studies · 907 participantsModerate
3% prilocaine, 0.03 IU felypressin vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: pain following injection · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: pain following injection, Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario… · Measured at the time anaesthesia wore off
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD 6.41 [1.01, 11.8]3 studies · 156 participantsModerate
4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Success of local anaesthesia, absence of pain (clinical testing of healthy pulps, hard and soft tissues) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario… · 5 minutes post-injection to end of clinical procedure
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.02]3 studies · 930 participantsVery low
4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: See comment, not estimable; 63 participants, 187 interventions (1 study); 1 case of urticaria occurred (unclear which anaesthetic). Not pooled/graded.1 study · 63 participantsUngraded
2% mepivacaine, 1:20,000 levonordefrin vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Success of local anaesthesia (clinical; orphan data) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
No data available for meta-analysis; orphan clinical success data summarized in Table 6 (e.g. clinical anaesthesia success 2% lidocaine 1:100,000 64/110 vs 2% mepivacaine 1:20,000 levonordefrin 99/113). Not…NRUngraded
4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: pain following injection · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: See comment (orphan study; exact time of follow-up not reported); 86 participants, 172 interventions (1 study). Not pooled/graded.1 study · 86 participantsUngraded
4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Duration of anaesthesia (soft tissue, simulated) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD 56.88 [44.08, 69.69]2 studies · 422 participantsLow
2% mepivacaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Adverse effects: allergy to local anaesthetic · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: Not measured.0 studiesNo studies
4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 0.5% bupivacaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine
Duration of anaesthesia (soft tissue, simulated) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD -172.61 [-239.69, -105.53]2 studies · 39 participantsVery low
4% articaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine
Speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.15 [-0.42, 0.73]5 studies · 162 participantsVery low
4% prilocaine, 1:200,000 epinephrine vs 4% prilocaine plain
Success of local anaesthesia (clinical/EPT; orphan data) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario…
Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia (2018) · Cochrane
No data available for meta-analysis; data summarized in Table 5 (orphan). Not pooled/graded.NRUngraded
Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid
Mortality (in‐hospital death and 30‐day mortality) · adults receiving intravenous fluids whilst undergoing any form of surgery
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve… (2017) · Cochrane
OR 1.85 [0.37, 9.33]3 studies · 267 participantsLow
Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid
Organ system failure ‐ renal insufficiency requiring support · adults receiving intravenous fluids whilst undergoing any form of surgery
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve… (2017) · Cochrane
OR 0.82 [0.34, 1.98]4 studies · 267 participantsLow
Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid
Plasma pH ‐ postoperative pH · adults receiving intravenous fluids whilst undergoing any form of surgery
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 720 participantsModerate
Buffered vs non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid
Serum chloride (mmol/L) ‐ postoperative chloride · adults receiving intravenous fluids whilst undergoing any form of surgery
Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 530 participantsModerate
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Pain intensity measures Cocaine‐containing topical anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1006 participantsLow
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Pain intensity measures Comparisons between different cocaine‐containing topical anaesthetics · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 530 participantsLow
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Pain intensity measures Cocaine‐free topical anaesthetics compared with infiltrated local anaesthetics · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 543 participantsLow
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Pain intensity measures Cocaine‐fee topical anaesthetics compared with cocaine‐containing topical anaesthetics · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted11 studies · 1231 participantsLow
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Pain intensity measures Comparisons between different cocaine‐free topical anaesthetics · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 656 participantsLow
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs infiltrated local anaesthetics or other topical agents
Anaesthetic‐related adverse effects · adults and paediatric patients with dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0 [0, 0]11 studies · 1686 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Participant self‐reported VAS (0‐100 mm) pain scores · treatment repair of dermal laceration
Topical anaesthetics for pain control during repair of dermal laceration (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 240 participantsLow
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Inadequate oxygenation (SaO₂ < 90% on peripheral oxygen saturation) · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.17, 3.31]4 studies · 617 participantsVery low
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Inadequate ventilation ( ETCO₂ > 45 mm Hg) · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsUngraded
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Time required for effective airway (seconds) · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 434 participantsLow
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Peak airway pressure during positive pressure ventilation (cm H₂O) · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 259 participantsLow
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (seal pressure) (cm H₂O) · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 709 participantsLow
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Sore throat · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.55, 1.08]5 studies · 653 participantsLow
ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
Regurgitation · adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.8 [0.24, 2.69]4 studies · 597 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Primary outcomes · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Difficult tracheal intubation: low risk of bias trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 13.27 [8.19, 21.49]4 studies · 508 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Difficult tracheal intubation: all trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5 [3.49, 7.15]34 studies · 3565 participantsLow
Intervention NR
One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: low risk of bias trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.74 [1.21, 6.21]1 study · 73 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
One or more events of upper airway discomfort or injury: all trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.37 [1.09, 1.74]7 studies · 846 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Mortality · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 34 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Secondary outcomes · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Difficult laryngoscopy: low risk of bias trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 4 [0.47, 34.2]1 study · 78 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Difficult laryngoscopy: all trials · improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.54 [1.53, 4.21]13 studies · 1308 participantsLow
Traumatic needles vs atraumatic needles
Onset of PDPH · patients undergoing lumbar punctures
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.14 [1.72, 2.67]36 studies · 9378 participantsModerate
Larger traumatic needles vs smaller traumatic needles
Any headache · patients undergoing lumbar punctures with traumatic needles (Quincke, Greene, Hingson Ferguson, Lutz, Brace,…
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 771 participantsModerate
Larger atraumatic needles vs smaller atraumatic needles
Onset of PDPH · patients undergoing lumbar punctures with atraumatic needles (Whitacre, Atraucan, Sprotte, Cappe‐Deutsh, Pajunk,…
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 3134 participantsLow
Larger atraumatic needles vs smaller atraumatic needles
Adverse events: paraesthesia · patients undergoing lumbar punctures with atraumatic needles (Whitacre, Atraucan, Sprotte, Cappe‐Deutsh, Pajunk,…
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 439 participantsModerate
Larger atraumatic needles vs smaller atraumatic needles
Adverse events: backache · patients undergoing lumbar punctures with atraumatic needles (Whitacre, Atraucan, Sprotte, Cappe‐Deutsh, Pajunk,…
Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 526 participantsModerate