Cochrane · systematic review · CD009026
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery
Qamarul Hoda, M, Samad, K, Ullah, H · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 14.3%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adult patients undergoing elective surgery
Population: adult patients (18 years of age and older) for positive pressure ventilation undergoing elective surgery
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Inadequate oxygenation (SaO₂ < 90% on peripheral oxygen saturation) ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | RR 0.75 [0.17, 3.31] | 4 studies · 617 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Inadequate ventilation ( ETCO₂ > 45 mm Hg) ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 80 participants | Ungraded |
Time required for effective airway (seconds) ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 434 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Peak airway pressure during positive pressure ventilation (cm H₂O) ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 259 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (seal pressure) (cm H₂O) ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 709 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Sore throat ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | RR 0.77 [0.55, 1.08] | 5 studies · 653 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Regurgitation ProSeal vs Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) | RR 0.8 [0.24, 2.69] | 4 studies · 597 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |