Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Multidimensional powered toothbrush vs Side to side action powered toothbrush
Plaque (level reduction) · People of any age with no reported disability affecting their ability to practise normal self-toothbrushing;… · Short term (1-3 months)
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health (2010) · Cochrane
Analysis 5.1 Plaque < 3 months (Turesky): 3 trials, 236 participants (Goyal 2005; Patters 2005; Zimmer 2005); significant heterogeneity (P < 0.1; I2 = 96%), so no statistical pooling was undertaken.3 studies · 236 participantsUngraded
Immediate implants (placed just after tooth extraction) vs Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth extraction)
Aesthetics assessed by dentist: position of the perimplant tissues · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets · 2 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate,… (2010) · Cochrane
Two years after implant placement there were no implant failures, complications or drop-outs, nor statistically significant differences for the level of the perimplant marginal mucosa in relation to the implant collar…1 study · 16 participantsUngraded
Powered toothbrushing vs Manual toothbrushing
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 6 weeks
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 0.10 [-0.66, 0.86]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Sonic toothbrushing vs Manual toothbrushing
Plaque · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.14 [-0.47, 0.19]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Hypnosis vs Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen
Patient preference / acceptance of treatment · Children aged 10 to 16 years undergoing orthodontic extractions (Braithwaite 2005)
Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment (2010) · Cochrane
The majority of patients preferred inhalation sedation over hypnosis. (Braithwaite 2005; 10 patients.)1 study · 10 participantsUngraded
Amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (AmF/SnF2) mouthwash vs Chlorhexidine mouthwash
Implant failure · Adults with dental implants and healthy peri-implant soft tissues at baseline · 3 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.28 [0.01, 6.43]1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Sufentanil vs Hydromorphone
Average pain scores (0-100 VAS) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis
Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane
Sufentanil vs hydromorphone (Coda 1997): no statistically significant difference; no separate estimate reported1 studyUngraded
Neutron radiotherapy vs Conventional photon radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and…
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
HR 1.10 [0.90, 1.34]3 studiesUngraded
Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) vs Placebo or no treatment
Time to heal mucositis (days) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis
Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane
MD -1.10 [-3.59, 1.39]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Mechanical debridement plus topical minocycline vs Mechanical debridement plus chlorhexidine gel
Change in probing pocket depth · Adults with dental implants and peri-implant mucositis at baseline · 12 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental… (2010) · Cochrane
MD 0.30 [-0.17, 0.77]1 study · 32 participantsUngraded
Accelerated/split-course radiotherapy vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy
Total mortality · People with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (ICD-O C01-C06) or oropharynx (ICD-O C09-C10); head and… · 5 years
Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.57, 2.43]1 study · 147 participantsUngraded
Hypnosis vs Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen
Total treatment time · Children aged 10 to 16 years undergoing orthodontic extractions (Braithwaite 2005)
Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment (2010) · Cochrane
No significant difference in total treatment time between inhalation sedation and hypnorelaxation; hypnorelaxation demanded little additional time to complete care. (Braithwaite 2005.)1 study · 10 participantsUngraded
Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention)
Difference in post-operative anxiety between test and control groups · Children and adolescents up to 16 years of age undergoing dental treatment
Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment (2010) · Cochrane
Difference in post-operative anxiety was a protocol-planned outcome but was not measured or reported by any included study (no post-operative anxiety scale was reported).NRNo studies
Cognitive behavioural therapy vs Control (treatment as usual)
Daily mean opiate intake per hour · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis
Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane
MD -0.20 [-4.29, 3.89]1 study · 21 participantsUngraded
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Service utilisation: Hospital admission ‐ at about 12 months · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.78 [0.63, 0.98]9 studies · 532 participantsLow
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Global state: Relapse ‐ at about 12 months · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.48, 0.62]32 studies · 2981 participantsLow
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Compliance: Poor compliance with medication · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.49, 0.73]10 studies · 695 participantsLow
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Social functioning: Specific ‐ unemployed ‐ at about 1 year · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.89, 1.25]5 studies · 285 participantsLow
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Social functioning: Specific ‐ unable to live independently ‐ at about 1 year · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.66, 1.03]3 studies · 164 participantsLow
ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs STANDARD CARE
Family outcome: Burden ‐ not improved/worse (objective burden related to self‐sufficiency) · patients with schizophrenia
Family intervention for schizophrenia (2010) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.21, 1.37]1 study · 51 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 1 month or less · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.34 [1.15, 1.55]16 studies · 5093 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 8 to 19 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.27 [1.04, 1.55]18 studies · 4347 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 20 to 30 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 0.98 [0.82, 1.17]11 studies · 2708 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 8 to 19 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.37 [1.15, 1.64]11 studies · 3932 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 20 to 30 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.16 [0.94, 1.42]9 studies · 2476 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 3 months or less · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.18 [0.98, 1.41]7 studies · 2068 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 90 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.16 [0.65, 2.06]2 studies · 207 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 30 to 45 days · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.18 [0.97, 1.43]5 studies · 1861 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 1 month or less · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.86, 1.33]8 studies · 1709 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 3 months or less · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 0.89 [0.66, 1.21]3 studies · 701 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Treatment failure at 1 month or less · patients with acute otitis media
Short‐course antibiotics for acute otitis media (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.02 [0.87, 1.2]19 studies · 4354 participantsUngraded
Laparoscopic surgery vs diagnostic laparoscopy
ongoing pregnancy at 20 weeks or live birth · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.64 [1.05, 2.57]2 studies · 437 participantsLow
Laparoscopic surgery vs diagnostic laparoscopy
pregnancy · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.66 [1.09, 2.51]2 studies · 437 participantsVery low
Laparoscopic surgery vs diagnostic laparoscopy
fetal loss per couple randomised · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis (2010) · Cochrane
OR 1.33 [0.6, 2.94]2 studies · 437 participantsLow
Laparoscopic surgery vs diagnostic laparoscopy
operative complications · patients with subfertility associated with endometriosis
Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis (2010) · Cochrane
OR 2.69 [0.38, 19.3]1 study · 341 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1835 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Function (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1398 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Adverse events · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Side effects of acupuncture‐Bruising and bleeding at injection site · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Function (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1767 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1399 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Function (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1398 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Adverse events · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Side effects of acupuncture‐Bruising and bleeding at injection site · Patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1773 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Function (short term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 68 points (higher is worse function). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1767 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain (long term) WOMAC scale from 0 to 20 points (higher is worse pain). · Patients with knee osteoarthritis
Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1399 participantsHigh
Summary of findings: Behavioural treatment vs waiting list control
Pain intensity VAS scale (0‐100) short‐term · adults with chronic low‐back pain
Behavioural treatment for chronic low‐back pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 74 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Pain intensity various scales long‐term · adults with chronic low‐back pain
Behavioural treatment for chronic low‐back pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 48 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Functional status (generic) Sickness Impact Profile (0‐136) short‐term · adults with chronic low‐back pain
Behavioural treatment for chronic low‐back pain (2010) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 61 participantsLow