Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Pain ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (>12 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (mean 23 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain ‐ not reported · patients with chronic (>6 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Disabilty ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (>6 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (>6 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Disability DASH scale. Scale from: 0 to 100. ( · patients with chronic (>12 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 47 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (>12 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain‐ short term VAS scale. Scale from: 0 to 10. ( · patients with lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Pain‐ long term VAS. Scale from: 0 to 10. ( · patients with lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Disability Mayo Elbow Performance. Scale from: 0 to 100. ( · patients with lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events ‐ not reported · patients with lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pain ‐ not reported · patients with chronic (mean 23 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Disability ‐ not measured · patients with chronic (mean 23 months) lateral elbow pain
Surgery for lateral elbow pain (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Death · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 121 participantsUngraded
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Symptomatic hyponatraemia · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsUngraded
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Severe biochemical hyponatraemia(serum sodium < 125 mmol/L) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.35 [0.02, 8.1]2 studies · 102 participantsLow
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Biochemical hyponatraemia(serum sodium < 130 mmol/L) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.26, 1.69]2 studies · 102 participantsLow
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Duration of diarrhoea(in hours) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 102 participantsLow
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Stool output in first 24 hours after admission or randomization · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Need for unscheduled intravenous infusion · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.66, 1.12]5 studies · 616 participantsModerate
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Symptomatic hyponatraemia · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 620 participantsUngraded
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Biochemical hyponatraemia (serum sodium < 130 mmol/L) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.67 [1.09, 2.57]4 studies · 465 participantsModerate
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Severe biochemical hyponatraemia (serum sodium < 125 mmol/L) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.58 [0.62, 4.04]4 studies · 465 participantsLow
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Duration of diarrhoea (in hours) · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 683 participantsModerate
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (glucose‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Stool output in first 24 hours after admission or randomization · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 581 participantsModerate
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Death · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
ORS ≤ 270 mOsm/L (rice‐based) vs ORS ≥ 310 mOsm/L (glucose‐based)
Need for unscheduled intravenous infusion · patients with cholera
Oral rehydration salt solution for treating cholera: ≤ 270 mOsm/L solutions vs ≥ 310 mOsm/L solutions (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Catheter‐related blood stream infection (CRBI) Same organism recovered from catheter tip and blood culture · patients with central venous catheters
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters (2011) · Cochrane
OR 4.19 [1.02, 17.23]4 studies · 337 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Exit‐site infection Laboratory testing · patients with central venous catheters
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters (2011) · Cochrane
OR 1.78 [0.62, 5.08]3 studies · 265 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Positive catheter culture Laboratory testing · patients with central venous catheters
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters (2011) · Cochrane
OR 0.74 [0.27, 2.09]2 studies · 138 participantsLow
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Feasibility and engagement: lost to · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.82, 1.08]5 studies · 1694 participantsModerate
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Extent of hospital care: 1. duration of index admission · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 1582 participantsModerate
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Extent of hospital care: 3. duration of day patient care (adjusted days/month) · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 465 participantsVery low
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Extent of hospital care: 5. readmitted to in/day patient care after discharge · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.72, 1.15]5 studies · 667 participantsVery low
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Unemployed (at end of study) · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.67, 0.97]2 studies · 320 participantsLow
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Quality of life: average overall role score ‐ at 12 months MANSA ‐ Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1117 participantsModerate
Day hospital vs Inpatient
Treatment satisfaction: average overall role score ‐ at discharge CAT ‐ Client Assessment of Treatment · patients with acute psychiatric disorders
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1117 participantsModerate
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol vs budesonide/formoterol
Participants experiencing exacerbations requiring oral steroid treatment · Patients with chronic asthma in adults and children
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic… (2011) · Cochrane
OR 0.89 [0.74, 1.07]4 studies · 4949 participantsModerate
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol vs budesonide/formoterol
Participants experiencing exacerbations requiring admission to hospital · Patients with chronic asthma in adults and children
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic… (2011) · Cochrane
OR 1.29 [0.68, 2.47]4 studies · 4879 participantsModerate
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol vs budesonide/formoterol
Asthma‐related serious adverse event · Patients with chronic asthma in adults and children
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic… (2011) · Cochrane
OR 1.47 [0.75, 2.86]3 studies · 4054 participantsModerate
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol vs budesonide/formoterol
Mortality · Patients with chronic asthma in adults and children
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic… (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 4819 participantsLow
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol vs budesonide/formoterol
Withdrawals (adverse events) · Patients with chronic asthma in adults and children
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic… (2011) · Cochrane
OR 0.94 [0.6, 1.46]5 studies · 5082 participantsModerate
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard
Retention in treatment Objective · patients with treatment of opioid dependence
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]26 studies · 2582 participantsHigh
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard
Opioid abstinence objective · patients with treatment of opioid dependence
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.19 [0.91, 1.56]7 studies · 667 participantsHigh
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard
Number of participants still in treatment at the end of · patients with treatment of opioid dependence
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.77, 1.07]3 studies · 250 participantsHigh
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard
Number of participants abstinent at the end of · patients with treatment of opioid dependence
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.15 [0.98, 1.36]3 studies · 181 participantsHigh
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard
Compliance objective · patients with treatment of opioid dependence
Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 685 participantsModerate
Transfer from incubator to cot at lower vs higher body weight
Daily weight gain (g/kg/day) · patients with preterm infants
Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight (2011) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 276 participantsHigh
Transfer from incubator to cot at lower vs higher body weight
Proportion of infants having at least one episode of low temperature requiring overhead heater use · patients with preterm infants
Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.43 [0.78, 2.62]2 studies · 276 participantsHigh
Transfer from incubator to cot at lower vs higher body weight
Proportion of infants having at least one episode of returning to incubator · patients with preterm infants
Transfer of preterm infants from incubator to open cot at lower versus higher body weight (2011) · Cochrane
RR 1.78 [0.77, 4.08]3 studies · 336 participantsModerate