Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,087 questions · 2,360 findings · 390 reviews

No studies found 224 · 9.5%GRADE not reported 603 · 25.6%Very low 555 · 23.5%Low 548 · 23.2%Moderate 312 · 13.2%High 118 · 5%

Brush biopsy (oral cytology) vs No screening

Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluorescence imaging / light-based techniques vs No screening

Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers vs No screening

Survival (proportion alive after diagnosis) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
1 finding from 1 review

PHASE SPECIFIC TREATMENT (RISPERIDONE + CBT) + SPECIALISED TEAM vs SPECIALISED TEAM

Progression to psychosis ‐ by 12 months · people with psychosis

PHASE SPECIFIC TREATMENT (RISPERIDONE + CBT) + SPECIALISED TEAM probably leads to lower progression to psychosis ‐ by 6 months compared with SPECIALISED TEAM (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

SPECIALISED TEAM vs usual care

Compliance with treatment ‐ treatment stopped in spite of need ‐ by one year · people with psychosis

SPECIALISED TEAM probably leads to lower compliance with treatment ‐ treatment stopped in spite of need ‐ by… compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SPECIALISED TEAM vs usual care

Compliance with treatment ‐ treatment stopped in spite of need ‐ by two years · people with psychosis

SPECIALISED TEAM showed no clear difference in compliance with treatment ‐ treatment stopped in spite of need ‐ by… compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SPECIALISED TEAM vs usual care

Service use: 2. Not hospitalised ‐ by five years · people with psychosis

SPECIALISED TEAM showed no clear difference in service use: 2. Not hospitalised ‐ by five years compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SPECIALISED TEAM vs usual care

Social outcomes: 1. Not living independently ‐ by 5 years · people with psychosis

SPECIALISED TEAM probably leads to lower social outcomes: 1. Not living independently ‐ by 5 years compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

SPECIALISED TEAM vs usual care

Social outcomes: 2. Not working or in education ‐ by 5 years · people with psychosis

SPECIALISED TEAM showed no clear difference in social outcomes: 2. Not working or in education ‐ by 5 years compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review