Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

731 questions in 61 reviews · Drugs and Alcohol

current versions
No studies 57 · 7.8%Ungraded 39 · 5.3%Very low 186 · 25.4%Low 239 · 32.7%Moderate 171 · 23.4%High 39 · 5.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Carbamazepine vs tricyclic antidepressant
Benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms, longest · adults who withdraw from chronic benzodiazepine use
Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Carbamazepine vs placebo
Benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms, end of intervention · adults who withdraw from chronic benzodiazepine use
Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 76 participantsVery low
Carbamazepine vs placebo
Benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms, longest · adults who withdraw from chronic benzodiazepine use
Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Lithium vs placebo
Benzodiazepine discontinuation, end of intervention · adults who withdraw from chronic benzodiazepine use
Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.86, 1.28]1 study · 230 participantsLow
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Peak withdrawal severity ‐ Naltrexone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 184 participantsVery low
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Peak withdrawal severity ‐ Naloxone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 91 participantsVery low
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Overall withdrawal severity ‐ Naltrexone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 256 participantsVery low
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Overall withdrawal severity ‐ Naloxone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsVery low
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Completion rate ‐ Naltrexone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 330 participantsVery low
Antagonist‐adrenergic combination vs adrenergic agonist
Completion rate ‐ Naloxone · opioid dependent adults
Opioid antagonists with minimal sedation for opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 463 participantsVery low
Buprenorphine vs methadone
Mean days in treatment · Adults with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 82 participantsLow
Rapid vs slow taper of buprenorphine dose
Completion of withdrawal treatment − Outpatient · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.44, 1.7]4 studies · 647 participantsVery low
Rapid vs slow taper of buprenorphine dose
Number abstinent at completion of dose taper − Inpatient · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.81, 1.23]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Rapid vs slow taper of buprenorphine dose
Number abstinent at completion of dose taper − Outpatient · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.39, 2.24]4 studies · 619 participantsVery low
Buprenorphine vs methadone
Completion of withdrawal treatment · Adults with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.91, 1.2]5 studies · 457 participantsModerate
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Mean peak withdrawal score, · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 521 participantsVery low
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Mean overall withdrawal score, with various methods of assessment · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 902 participantsModerate
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Mean days in treatment (with varying scheduled duration) · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
SMD 0.92 [0.57, 1.27]4 studies · 558 participantsModerate
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Number experiencing adverse effects · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.7, 1.26]3 studies · 493 participantsVery low
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Number with treatment stopped due to adverse effects · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.04, 1.15]3 studies · 134 participantsLow
Buprenorphine vs alpha2‐adrenergic agonists
Number completing withdrawal treatment · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.59 [1.23, 2.06]11 studies · 1264 participantsModerate
Rapid vs slow taper of buprenorphine dose
Completion of withdrawal treatment − Inpatient · Adults or adolescents with opioid dependence
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.84, 1.18]2 studies · 60 participantsLow
Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention
Quantity of drinking (g/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted41 studies · 19241 participantsModerate
Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention
Adverse events · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention
Frequency of drinking (number of days drinking/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 studies · 10862 participantsModerate
Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention
Frequency of binge drinking (number of binges/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 studies · 3587 participantsModerate
Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention
Intensity of drinking (g/drinking day), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 studies · 9791 participantsModerate
Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention
Adverse events · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention
Quantity of drinking (g/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 390 participantsLow
Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention
Frequency of drinking (number of days drinking/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 58 participantsLow
Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention
Frequency of binge drinking (number of binges/week), based on longest · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 206 participantsLow
Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention
Intensity of drinking (g/drinking day) · s
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in… (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Retention ‐ retention at the end of treatment (number of participants) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.88, 1.12]4 studies · 716 participantsLow
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Retention ‐ retention at 3 months (number of participants) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.84, 1.05]3 studies · 472 participantsLow
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Adverse serious events (any) (number of participants) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.63 [0.1, 3.86]2 studies · 363 participantsVery low
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Abstinence from unsanctioned opioid use (number of participants with urine drug screen or self‐report use) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 293 participantsVery low
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Diversion (number of participants) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 293 participantsVery low
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Frequency of unsanctioned opioid use at the end of the intervention (number of days) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
Mortality ‐ (number of participants) · patients with opioid dependence
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 230 participantsLow
Current OST vs no OST
HCV incidence adjusted analyses number of HCV seroconversion · people who inject drugs
Needle syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing hepatitis C transmission in people… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.4, 0.63]12 studies · 6361 participantsLow
High NSP coverage vs no/low NSP coverage
HCV incidence adjusted analyses number of HCV seroconversion · people who inject drugs
Needle syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing hepatitis C transmission in people… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.79 [0.39, 1.61]5 studies · 3530 participantsVery low
Combined OST and high NSP vs no OST and low/no NSP
HCV incidence adjusted analyses number of HCV seroconversions · people who inject drugs
Needle syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing hepatitis C transmission in people… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.26 [0.07, 0.89]3 studies · 3241 participantsLow
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Participants with severe withdrawal · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.18 [0.81, 1.73]5 studies · 340 participantsLow
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs placebo
1Small number of events. · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 participantsUngraded
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Peak withdrawal score · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 263 participantsModerate
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Overall withdrawal severity · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 119 participantsModerate
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Duration of treatment · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 310 participantsLow
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Number experiencing hypotensive or other adverse effects · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.92 [1.19, 3.1]6 studies · 464 participantsLow
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Drop‐out due to adverse effects · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
RR 3.62 [0.77, 16.94]4 studies · 153 participantsLow
Alpha2‐adrenergic agonist vs methadone
Completion of treatment · People undergoing managed opioid withdrawal
Alpha₂‐adrenergic agonists for the management of opioid withdrawal (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.69, 1.05]9 studies · 659 participantsLow