Cochrane · systematic review · CD011983

Supervised dosing with a long‐acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence

Saulle, R, Vecchi, S, Gowing, L · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Drugs and AlcoholAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 14.3%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication compared to unsupervised consumption for opioid dependence

Population: patients with opioid dependence
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Retention ‐ retention at the end of treatment (number of participants)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
RR 0.99 [0.88, 1.12]4 studies · 716 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Retention ‐ retention at 3 months (number of participants)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
RR 0.94 [0.84, 1.05]3 studies · 472 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse serious events (any) (number of participants)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
RR 0.63 [0.1, 3.86]2 studies · 363 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Abstinence from unsanctioned opioid use (number of participants with urine drug screen or self‐report use)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
no estimate extracted1 study · 293 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Diversion (number of participants)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
no estimate extracted1 study · 293 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Frequency of unsanctioned opioid use at the end of the intervention (number of days)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Mortality ‐ (number of participants)
Supervised dosing with a long‐acting medication vs unsupervised consumption
no estimate extracted1 study · 230 participantsLow