Cochrane · systematic review · CD011479
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling populations
Kaner, EFS, Beyer, FR, Garnett, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Drugs and AlcoholAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 30%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 30%Moderate 4 · 40%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Digital intervention compared to no or minimal intervention for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling populations
Population: s
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantity of drinking (g/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention | no estimate extracted | 41 studies · 19241 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Frequency of drinking (number of days drinking/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 10862 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Frequency of binge drinking (number of binges/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 3587 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Intensity of drinking (g/drinking day), based on longest Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 9791 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Adverse events Digital intervention vs no or minimal intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Digital intervention compared to face‐to‐face intervention for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community‐dwelling populations
Population: s
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Quantity of drinking (g/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 390 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Frequency of drinking (number of days drinking/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 58 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Frequency of binge drinking (number of binges/week), based on longest Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 206 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Intensity of drinking (g/drinking day) Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse events Digital intervention vs face‐to‐face intervention | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |