Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

15 questions · 17 findings · 4 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 17.6%Low 11 · 64.7%Moderate 3 · 17.6%High 0 · 0%

Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs psychosocial interventions

Retention [ · alcohol use disorder

Pharmacologic intervention along with psychosocial intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with psychosocial intervention alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacologic intervention vs another pharmacologic intervention

Retention [ · alcohol use disorder

Pharmacologic intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with another pharmacologic intervention (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Motivational interviewing vs treatment

Retention [ · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users

Motivational interviewing (MI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with treatment (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Retention in treatment · adults with cannabis use disorder or frequent cannabis use
1 finding from 1 review

Brief motivational interviewing (BMI) vs assessment‐only to reduce alcohol consumption

Retention [ · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users

Brief motivational interviewing (BMI) showed no clear difference in retention ‐ end of treatment compared with assessment‐only to reduce alcohol consumption (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Motivational interviewing intensive (MII) vs motivational interviewing (MI) to reduce alcohol consumption

Retention [ · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users

Motivational interviewing intensive (MII) may leads to higher retention ‐ end of treatment compared with motivational interviewing (MI) to reduce alcohol consumption (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cognitive‐behavioural coping skills training (CBCST) vs Twelve Step Facilitation

Retention [ · concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users

It is very uncertain whether cognitive‐behavioural coping skills training (CBCST) changes retention ‐ end of treatment compared with twelve‐step facilitation (TSF) programme to reduce alcohol consumption (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review