Pharmacologic intervention vs another pharmacologic intervention: Retention [
Pharmacologic intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with another pharmacologic intervention (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pharmacologic intervention vs another pharmacologic intervention Retention · individuals with alcohol use disorder Pharmacologic intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with another pharmacologic intervention (low certainty). Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.95 [0.76, 1.19] | 2 studies · 190 participants | Low |
Pharmacologic intervention vs another pharmacologic intervention Retention · individuals with alcohol use disorder Pharmacologic intervention showed no clear difference in retention compared with another pharmacologic intervention (low certainty). Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low‐ and middle‐income countries (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.02 [0.96, 1.08] | 2 studies · 200 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.