Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

27 questions · 30 findings · 7 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 8 · 26.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 13 · 43.3%Low 6 · 20%Moderate 3 · 10%High 0 · 0%

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, melanoma and oesophageal

Non‐specialist‐led showed no clear difference in health‐related quality of life, (at 12 months' compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Quality of life · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led interventions vs enhanced usual care

Quality of life (1 to 6 months post intervention) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

Primary health professional‐ and community professional‐led… showed no clear difference in quality of life (1 to 6 months post intervention) compared with enhanced usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Indicated prevention interventions vs control group

QoL · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions vs control group

QoL · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Selective prevention interventions vs control group

QoL · preventing mental disorders
2 findings from 1 review