Question · asked by 1 review
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care: Quality of life
- Population
- adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
- Intervention
- Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
- Comparison
- enhanced usual care
- Outcome
- Quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care Quality of life · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use The review found no eligible studies for this question. Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and middle‐income countries 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.