Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

12 questions · 12 findings · 11 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 75%Low 2 · 16.7%Moderate 1 · 8.3%High 0 · 0%

Miniport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs standard port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Operating time · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
12 studies · 695 participants
Very low

T‐tube drainage vs primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Operating time · laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

1 finding from 1 review

T‐tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 295 participants
Very low

Low‐pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum

Operating time · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
19 studies · 990 participants
Low

Fewer‐than‐four ports vs four ports

Operating time · people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Fewer‐than‐four ports versus four ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 855 participants
Very low

Supplementary box model training vs standard training

Operating time · surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Operating time · people with acute cholecystitis.

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 488 participants
Moderate

Routine abdominal drain vs No drain

Operating time · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 745 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Operating time · patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 107 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Operating time · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
16 studies · 649 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Operating time · surgical trainees training in laparoscopic surgery.

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 49 participants
Very low

Robotic assistant vs human assistant

Operating time · patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

1 finding from 1 review

Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 324 participants
Very low

Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Operating time · people with biliary colic

1 finding from 1 review

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 63 participants
Very low