Cochrane · systematic review · CD010478
Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience
Gurusamy, KS, Nagendran, M, Toon, CD, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 60%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Supplementary box model training compared with standard training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience
Population: surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Supplementary box model training vs standard training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 168 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Morbidity Supplementary box model training vs standard training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 168 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Operating time Supplementary box model training vs standard training | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 50 participants | Low |
Proportion with day surgery Supplementary box model training vs standard training | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 50 participants | Low |
Operating performance Supplementary box model training vs standard training | no estimate extracted | 7 studies · 249 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |