Cochrane · systematic review · CD006578
Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Gurusamy, KS, Samraj, K, Fusai, G, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Robotic assistant compared to human assistant for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Conversion to open cholecystectomy Robotic assistant vs human assistant | RR 0.9 [0.25, 3.2] | 2 studies · 133 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Operating time Robotic assistant vs human assistant | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 324 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |