Cochrane · systematic review · CD007196
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic
Gurusamy, KS, Koti, R, Fusai, G, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic
Population: participants with biliary colic.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 0.38 [0.02, 9.03] | 1 study · 75 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Serious adverse events Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 0.07 [0, 1.23] | 1 study · 68 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Conversion to open cholecystectomy Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 0.1 [0.01, 1.63] | 1 study · 63 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Hospital stay (days) Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Operating time (minutes) Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |