Cochrane · systematic review · CD006930
Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Gurusamy, KS, Vaughan, J, Davidson, BR · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 80%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Low pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 434 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Serious adverse events Low pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum | RR 3 [0.14, 65.9] | 7 studies · 394 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Conversion to open cholecystectomy Low pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum | RR 1.18 [0.29, 4.72] | 10 studies · 556 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Hospital stay Low pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 415 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Operating time Low pressure vs standard pressure pneumoperitoneum | no estimate extracted | 19 studies · 990 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |