Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

67 questions · 69 findings · 35 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 9 · 13%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 21 · 30.4%Low 26 · 37.7%Moderate 11 · 15.9%High 2 · 2.9%

Non‐surgical vs surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes)

Long‐term mortality (binary outcome) All‐cause mortality for the duration of · patients with oesophageal cancer

Non‐surgical showed no clear difference in long‐term mortality (binary outcome) All‐cause mortality for the… compared with surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐surgical vs surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes)

Short‐term mortality All‐cause mortality either in‐hospital or within 3 months · patients with oesophageal cancer

It is very uncertain whether non‐surgical changes short‐term mortality All‐cause mortality either in‐hospital or… compared with surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐surgical vs surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes)

Long‐term mortality (time‐to‐event outcome): radiotherapy versus surgery All‐cause mortality for the duration of · patients with oesophageal cancer

It is very uncertain whether non‐surgical changes long‐term mortality (time‐to‐event outcome): radiotherapy versus… compared with surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐surgical vs surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes)

Long‐term mortality (time‐to‐event outcome): chemoradiotherapy versus surgery All‐cause mortality for the duration of · patients with oesophageal cancer

Non‐surgical showed no clear difference in long‐term mortality (time‐to‐event outcome): chemoradiotherapy… compared with surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer (primary outcomes) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Surgical portosystemic shunts vs devascularisation with splenectomy

All‐cause mortality · people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis

It is very uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunts changes all‐cause mortality compared with devascularisation with splenectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical portosystemic shunts vs transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

All‐cause mortality at 30 days · people with cirrhotic portal hypertension

It is very uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunts changes all‐cause mortality at 30 days compared with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical portosystemic shunts vs transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

All‐cause mortality at 5 years · people with cirrhotic portal hypertension

It is very uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunts changes all‐cause mortality at 5 years compared with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) vs surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS)

Surgically‐related postoperative mortality (28 days to 6 months of surgery4) · women with advanced ovarian epithelial cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval surgery (NACT) leads to lower surgically‐related postoperative mortality (28 days to 6 months of… compared with surgery followed by chemotherapy (PDS) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement

All‐cause mortality · adults with severe aortic stenosis who are at a low surgical risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs parenteral nutrition

All‐cause mortality · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral showed no clear difference in mortality compared with parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Enteral vs enteral and parenteral nutrition

All‐cause mortality · critically ill adults admitted to the ICU for trauma, emergency, or post‐surgical care; population excludes participants with acute…

Enteral showed no clear difference in mortality compared with enteral and parenteral nutrition (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review