Probable early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Late induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
It is very uncertain whether any antibiotic changes probable early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Late induction of labour compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Definite early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Late induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
It is very uncertain whether any antibiotic changes definite early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Late induction of labour compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Probable early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Early induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
Any antibiotic showed no clear difference in probable early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Early induction of labour compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Definite early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Early induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
Any antibiotic showed no clear difference in definite early‐onset neonatal sepsis ‐ Early induction of labour compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis) ‐ Late induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
It is very uncertain whether any antibiotic changes maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis)… compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis) ‐ Early induction of labour · pregnant women with prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
Any antibiotic showed no clear difference in maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis)… compared with placebo or no antibiotic (subgrouped by timing of induction of labour) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with intravenous oxytocin/amniotomy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Amniotic membranes sweeping may leads to lower induction of labour compared with no treatment/sham (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
One frequency of amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with another frequency of amniotic membrane sweeping (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
Amniotic membranes sweeping showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with vaginal/intracervical prostaglandins (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour ‐ not reported · pregnant women carrying a live fetus at or near term (≥ 36 weeks' gestation).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Induction of labour · childbearing women and their infants (all) (important/secondary outcomes)
Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with other models of care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Intensity of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes… showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with less‐tight glycaemic targets (maternal outcomes) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women with diastolic hypertension
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Induction of labour · pregnant women, or those within 42 days of delivery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Induction of labour · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension
Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with conventional clinic measurement (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · women with gestational diabetes mellitus
It is very uncertain whether probiotic changes induction of labour compared with placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · pregnant women at increased risk of fetal complications
Umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound probably leads to lower induction of labour compared with no Doppler ultrasound (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · women with type 2 diabetes
It is very uncertain whether maternal outcomes: oral anti‐diabetic agent (metformin) changes induction of labour compared with insulin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Induction of labour · adolescent girls with type 1 or 2 diabetes
1 finding from 1 review