Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

38 questions · 38 findings · 26 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 12 · 31.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 18.4%Low 10 · 26.3%Moderate 8 · 21.1%High 1 · 2.6%

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Severe adverse events and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in severe adverse events and toxicity compared with radiotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review