Cochrane · systematic review · CD007003

Interventions for dialysis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection

Prabhu, AR, Rao, IR, Nagaraju, SP, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Kidney and Transplant2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
50
current version
GRADE rated
30
No studies
20
Included studies
NR
No studies 20 · 40%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 4%Low 22 · 44%Moderate 6 · 12%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Standard interferon versus placebo or control for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Population: patients on HD with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 0.89 [0.06, 13.23]5 studies · 134 participantsLow
Relapse(recurrence after stopping intervention)
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 0.72 [0.28, 1.88]1 study · 12 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
End‐of‐treatment response
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 8.62 [3.03, 24.55]5 studies · 132 participantsModerate
Sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 3.25 [0.81, 13.07]4 studies · 98 participantsModerate
Treatment discontinuation
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 4.59 [0.49, 42.69]4 studies · 116 participantsModerate
Adverse events
Standard interferon vs placebo or control
RR 3.56 [0.98, 13.01]5 studies · 143 participantsModerate

Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a versus standard interferon for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Population: patients on HD with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.81]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Relapse(recurrence after stopping)
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 0.72 [0.41, 1.25]1 study · 38 participantsLow
End‐of‐treatment response
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 1.53 [1.09, 2.15]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 2.4 [0.99, 5.81]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Treatment discontinuation
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.96]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Adverse events
Pegylated interferon alpha‐2a vs standard interferon
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.96]1 study · 50 participantsLow

High versus low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Population: patients on HD with HCV infection
14 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
PEG interferon alpha‐2a
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 5.66 [0.69, 46.31]1 study · 81 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon alpha‐2b
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 2.4 [0.11, 51.32]1 study · 16 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon (combined)
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 4.3 [0.76, 24.33]2 studies · 97 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon alpha‐2a
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 1.12 [0.4, 2.21]1 study · 43 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon (combined)
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 1.12 [0.4, 2.21]1 study · 43 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
End‐of‐treatment response
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
PEG interferon alpha‐2a
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 1.19 [0.79, 1.78]1 study · 81 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon (alpha‐2b)
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 5.6 [0.34, 93.35]1 study · 16 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
PEG interferon alpha‐2a
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 1.13 [0.64, 2]1 study · 81 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Treatment discontinuation
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
PEG interferon (combined)
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
RR 1.05 [0.61, 1.83]2 studies · 97 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serious adverse events
High vs low dose pegylated interferon alpha‐2a or alpha‐2b
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Standard interferon plus ribavirin versus standard interferon alone for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Population: patients on HD with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse(recurrence after stopping)
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
End‐of‐treatment response
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sustained virological response
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment discontinuation
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
RR 2.97 [1.19, 7.36]1 study · 52 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events
Standard interferon plus ribavirin vs standard interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin versus pegylated interferon alone for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C infection

Population: HD patients with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse(recurrence after stopping)
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
RR 0.33 [0.23, 0.48]1 study · 377 participantsLow
End‐of‐treatment response
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.09]1 study · 377 participantsLow
Sustained virological response
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
RR 1.8 [1.46, 2.21]1 study · 377 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Treatment discontinuation
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
RR 1.71 [0.69, 4.24]1 study · 377 participantsLow
Adverse events
Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin vs pegylated interferon alone
RR 1.1 [1.01, 1.19]1 study · 377 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) versus placebo for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C infection

Population: HD patients with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
End‐of‐treatment response
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
RR 174.99 [11.03, 2775.78]1 study · 173 participantsLow
Sustained virological response
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment discontinuation
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Direct antivirals (grazoprevir and elbasvir) vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) versus pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks) for haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C infection

Population: HD patients with HCV infection
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Sustained virological response
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
RR 1.02 [0.67, 1.56]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
End‐of‐treatment response
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
RR 1.02 [0.67, 1.56]1 study · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Treatment discontinuation
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Pegylated interferon + ribavirin (24 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) vs pegylated interferon (48 weeks) + initial telepravir (12 weeks) + initial low dose ribavirin (12 + 36 weeks)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies