Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy: Surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications
It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy Surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty). Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.13 [0.01, 2.14] | 1 study · 68 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.