Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

44 questions · 44 findings · 31 reviews

No studies found 17 · 38.6%GRADE not reported 1 · 2.3%Very low 7 · 15.9%Low 10 · 22.7%Moderate 8 · 18.2%High 1 · 2.3%

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs Radiotherapy alone

Severe adverse events and toxicity · women with locally advanced cervical cancer

Hysterectomy (simple or radical) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no clear difference in severe adverse events and toxicity compared with radiotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment vs other active intervention

Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Any antimicrobial mouthwash and/or nasal spray (alone or in combination), at any concentration, delivered to the patient or HCW before and/or after an AGP vs No treatment or saline or water

Changes in microbiome in oral cavity, nasal cavity, oro- or nasopharynx · Patients without suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), and the healthcare workers…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review