Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

41 questions · 43 findings · 22 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 24 · 55.8%GRADE not reported 2 · 4.7%Very low 7 · 16.3%Low 6 · 14%Moderate 4 · 9.3%High 0 · 0%

MET plus any intervention vs the intervention alone

Adverse events · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

MET plus any intervention vs other therapies plus that intervention

Adverse events · patients with non‐specific low‐back pain (LBP)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) vs usual care

Adverse events Proportion of participants with one or more events, or proportion of intervention sessions where an event occurred (falls, accidental dislodgement of attachments, haemodynamic instability, oxygen desaturation or any other adverse ev... · critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults
1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated communication intervention vs no intervention

Adverse events · children up to 5 years of age with a communication difficulty associated with any non‐progressive motor disorder acquired before 2 years…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Body awareness interventions vs control

Adverse events · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether body awareness interventions changes adverse events compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Patching vs active observation

Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection

Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged 3 to < 11 years

Bilateral lateral rectus recession showed no clear difference in minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of… compared with unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review