Cochrane · systematic review · CD003737

Interventions for intermittent exotropia

Pang, Y, Gnanaraj, L, Gayleard, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Eyes and VisionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
28
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
18
Included studies
NR
No studies 18 · 64.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 3.6%Low 5 · 17.9%Moderate 2 · 7.1%High 2 · 7.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Bilateral lateral rectus recession compared with unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection for intermittent exotropia

Population: people with intermittent exotropia, aged 3 to < 11 years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Motor alignment at near Change in exotropia control at near fixation, measured from baseline to 3 years using the prism and alternate cover test
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
MD 11 study · 163 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Stereoacuity at near Loss of ≥ 2 octaves near stereoacuity, measured using the Preschool Randot test 3 years after surgery
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
RR 0.77 [0.35, 1.71]1 study · 163 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Stereoacuity at distance
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Motor alignment at distance Change in exotropia control at near fixation, measured from baseline to 3 years using the prism and alternate cover test
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
MD 21 study · 163 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Motor fusion test
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
RR 7.36 [0.39, 140.65]1 study · 197 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life measures Measured at 3 years using the IXTQ scores for children, parents, or parent proxies (i.e. parents' perception of their children's quality of life). Scores could range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of l...
Bilateral lateral rectus recession vs unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection
no estimate extracted1 study · 163 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Patching compared with active observation for intermittent exotropia

Population: people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Motor alignment at near fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extracted2 studies · 511 participantsHigh
Stereoacuity at near Measured using the Preschool Randot, Titmus fly, and Titmus circles tests at 40 cm at 6 months
Patching vs active observation
MD 01 study · 324 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Stereoacuity at distance Loss of ≥ 2 octaves near stereoacuity, measured using the Preschool Randot test 3 years after surgery
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Motor alignment at distance fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extracted2 studies · 511 participantsHigh
Motor fusion test
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life measures Measured at 3 years using the IXTQ scores for children, parents, or parent proxies (i.e. parents' perception of their children's quality of life). Scores could range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of l...
Patching vs active observation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery compared with eye muscle surgery alone for intermittent exotropia

Population: people with intermittent exotropia, aged 5 to 49 years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Motor alignment at near fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stereoacuity at near
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stereoacuity at distance Measured using the Preschool Randot test 3 years after surgery
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Motor alignment at distance fixation Measured using PACT at 6 months
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Motor fusion test
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life measures Measured at 3 years using the IXTQ scores for children, parents, or parent proxies (i.e. parents' perception of their children's quality of life). Scores could range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of l...
Prism adaptation test with eye muscle surgery vs eye muscle surgery alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication compared with lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection for intermittent exotropia

Population: people with intermittent exotropia, aged over 6 years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Motor alignment at near fixation Measured using the PACT at 6 months
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stereoacuity at near
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stereoacuity at distance Loss of ≥ 2 octaves near stereoacuity Measured using the Preschool Randot test 3 years after surgery
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Motor alignment at distance fixation Measured using the PACT at 1 year
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
MD 0.661 study · 60 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Motor fusion test Measured using the synoptophore and Titmus fly test at 1 year
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
RR 0.92 [0.48, 1.74]1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life measures Measured at 3 years using the IXTQ scores for children, parents, or parent proxies (i.e. parents' perception of their children's quality of life). Scores could range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of l...
Lateral rectus recession and medial rectus plication vs lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection
no estimate extractedNRNo studies