Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

461 questions · 486 findings · 147 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 150 · 30.9%GRADE not reported 114 · 23.5%Very low 100 · 20.6%Low 58 · 11.9%Moderate 57 · 11.7%High 7 · 1.4%

Multi‐component intervention vs exercise

Adverse effects · Older people living in the community

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Interactive computer intervention vs usual care

Adverse effects · adults with overweight or obesity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interactive computer‐based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs placebo/usual care or different forms of intervention

Secondary outcome: all adverse events · people within 3 months after stroke

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for sexual dysfunction following stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manual paper reminders added to another QI intervention vs the same QI intervention

Adverse effects · Healthcare professionals

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manually‐generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physical activity interventions with a caregiver component vs interventions without a caregiver component

Adverse effects (not measured) · children aged 3 to 11 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Caregiver involvement in interventions for improving children's dietary intake and physical activity behaviors 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Dietary behavior change interventions with a caregiver component vs interventions without a caregiver component

Adverse effects (not measured) · children aged 7 to 18 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Caregiver involvement in interventions for improving children's dietary intake and physical activity behaviors 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Combined interventions vs usual care

Adverse effects: reinfarctions · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions showed no clear difference in adverse effects: reinfarctions compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.23, 1.43]
3 studies · 265 participants
Moderate

Anticholinergic burden reduction interventions vs usual care

Adverse effects · older adults with and without prior cognitive impairment

1 finding from 1 review

Anticholinergic deprescribing interventions for reducing risk of cognitive decline or dementia in older adults with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Maternal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including the ALARM course and training audit committees vs no intervention

Adverse effects · mothers delivering in the hospitals

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Group B antipsychotic drugs: amisulpiride + needs‐focused intervention vs needs‐focused intervention

Adverse effects: suicidal thoughts (events) · people in the prodromal stage of psychosis

It is very uncertain whether group B antipsychotic drugs: amisulpiride + needs‐focused intervention changes adverse effects: suicidal thoughts (events) compared with needs‐focused intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.25 [0.01, 6.1]
1 study · 102 participants
Very low

Perinatal death review and audit as part of an intervention package including an educational outreach visit and morbidity/mortality conferences vs no intervention

Adverse effects · births

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Death audits and reviews for reducing maternal, perinatal and child mortality 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercises + Cervical/Scapulothoracic+/‐UE Strengthening + Dynamic/Static Cervical Stabilization + ANOTHER INTERVENTION vs THAT SAME INTERVENTION

Adverse effects · patients with mechanical neck disorders

1 finding from 1 review

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 8 participants
GRADE not reported

Group C cognitive behavioural therapy: cognitive behavioural therapy + supportive intervention vs non‐directive reflective listening + supportive intervention

Adverse effects: at least one serious adverse event · people in the prodromal stage of psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Group B antipsychotic drugs: olanzapine + supportive intervention vs placebo or supportive treatment

Weight gain · people in the prodromal stage of psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Very low

Pharmacological intervention and a form of psychotherapy (combination) vs pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)

Gastrointestinal adverse events · people with depression after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for treating… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 54 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings: multimedia education and a co‐intervention vs co‐intervention alone

Medication side effects Mean adverse self‐medication behaviour score (lower scores indicate safer self‐medication behaviour). Scale from: 0 to 40. · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers

1 finding from 1 review

Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Group B cognitive behavioural therapy: cognitive behavioural therapy (specific preventive intervention) + needs‐based intervention + risperidone vs needs‐based intervention

Adverse effects: at least one serious adverse event · people in the prodromal stage of psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Physical conditioning interventions vs usual care

Cardiac mortality · patients with coronary heart disease

Physical conditioning interventions showed no clear difference in adverse effects: cardiac deaths compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.35, 2.8]
2 studies · 285 participants
Moderate

Gingko biloba with concurrent intervention vs concurrent intervention only

Serious adverse effects (bleeding or seizures) · adults with tinnitus

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Humour‐based interventions vs usual care

Adverse events as N of participants with at least one adverse event objective · patients with schizophrenia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Humour‐based interventions for people with schizophrenia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found