Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

24 questions · 24 findings · 12 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 19 · 79.2%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 4.2%Moderate 3 · 12.5%High 1 · 4.2%

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures · adults with PACS or PAC, and previous PI

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures · adults with PAC or PACG, and previous PI

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life measures · adults with PACS, PAC or PACG

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality‐of‐life measures at 1 year (National Eye Institute‐Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI‐VFQ]) · people with age‐related macular degeneration

The intervention showed no clear difference in quality‐of‐life measures at 1 year (National Eye Institute‐Visual… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Conventional occlusion vs atropine penalization

Quality of life (different measures and time points reported in the included studies) Assessed at different time points (17 weeks or 6 months) by patient preference or the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire. · Participants of any age with either unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or mixed (strabismic‐refractive) amblyopia; deprivation…
1 finding from 1 review