Quality of lifeValidated quality of life scales as used by authors, CGI (7‐point scale) where possible, higher scores indicate poorer quality of life · adults with Major Depressive Disorder
1 finding from 1 review
Mental distress · people with dementia and their carers
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life: CFQ‐R respiratory domain: absolute change from baseline · adults and children with CF with at least one class I mutation (PTC)
1 finding from 1 review
Bothersomeness of symptoms at short term (6 weeks) Measured by the Overactive Bladder Symptom and Quality of Life‐Short Form (OABq‐SF) (lower = better) · women with urge‐predominant urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Improvement in pain, self efficacy,patient activation, health‐related quality of life, social role satisfaction,resilience,positive and negative affect · chronic pain in MS
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐prostate [FACT‐P; range 0 to 156; higher values = better quality of life]) measured at 12 months · men with metastatic, hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer
1 finding from 1 review
Health-related quality of life (after at least 5 years follow-up) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HrQoL and self esteem a. DUX 25 (Dutch Child AZL TNO Quality‐of‐Life tool: total score and 4 domains; scale 0 to 100; higher score indicates better HrQoL) · preschool children (aged 0 to 6 years) with overweight or obesity
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life immediately after the intervention · people with Parkinson's disease
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (mental) · people with fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
1 finding from 1 review
Condition‐specific quality of life ICIQ Overactive Bladder Symptoms Quality of Life. Scale from: 25 to 160. Better quality of life indicated by lower values. · adults with urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life) · children with chronic constipation
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (mental) · people with TTR‐FAP
1 finding from 1 review
Physical quality of life · people with TTR‐FAP
1 finding from 1 review
Vision‐related quality of life · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life (e.g. absence from school, lost time at work, mobility) as assessed by any validated questionnaire either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · sickle cell disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life (e.g. absence from school, lost time at work, mobility) as assessed by any validated questionnaire either generic or SCD specific) ‐ not measured · people with sickle cell disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of lifeg Median · people with ESKD
Exercise may leads to higher HRQoL Investigators measured health related quality of life using… compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12 (range 0 to 100), and WHOQOL‐BREF (range 0 to 130). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review