Cochrane · systematic review · CD012622

Non‐pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis

Amatya, B, Young, J, Khan, F · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
28
current version
GRADE rated
27
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 3.6%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 27 · 96.4%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) compared to Sham for Chronic Back Pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic back pain in MS
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain intensity
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in disability
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of Life
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Ai Chi Exercises compared to Sham for Chronic Musculoskeletal pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic musculoskeletal pain in people with MS
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain intensity
Ai Chi Exercises vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 73 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in disability
Ai Chi Exercises vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 73 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Quality of Life
Ai Chi Exercises vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 73 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in Fatigue
Ai Chi Exercises vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 73 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) compared to Sham for Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic neuropathic pain in MS
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in Pain Intensity
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted2 studies · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in fatigue
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in depression and anxiety
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted2 studies · 35 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Improvement in QoL
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 19 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS)compared to Sham for Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic neuropathic pain in MS
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in anxiety and depression
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in fatigue
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Telephone‐Delivered Education Group compared to Sham for Chronic pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic pain in MS
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain interference, depression,fatigu e
Telephone‐Delivered Education Group vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 163 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Improvement in pain, self efficacy,patient activation, health‐related quality of life, social role satisfaction,resilience,positive and negative affect
Telephone‐Delivered Education Group vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 163 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Hypnosis compared to relaxation control for chronic pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic pain in MS
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain intensity
Hypnosis vs relaxation control
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in pain interference
Hypnosis vs relaxation control
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
BPI: Brief Pain Inventory
Hypnosis vs relaxation control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Neurofeedback compared to relaxation control for chronic pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic pain in MS
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain Intensity
Neurofeedback vs relaxation control
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in fatigue
Neurofeedback vs relaxation control
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in pain interference
Neurofeedback vs relaxation control
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias

Reflexology compared to Sham for Chronic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Population: chronic pain in MS
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Reduction in pain
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted2 studies · 110 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in disability
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Improvement in Quality of Life
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in Fatigue
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in depression
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Reduction in Spasms
Reflexology vs Sham
no estimate extracted1 study · 71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias