Question · asked by 1 review
Adverse event outcomes for dietary combined with physical activity interventions vs usual care: Health-related quality of life (after at least 5 years follow-up)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Diet plus physical activity vs standard treatment Health‐related quality of life Description: SF‐36 to evaluate the SF‐6D, PCS and MCS MID was defined as difference in scores between groups of at least 3% · people at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus Diet, physical activity or both for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 2144 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diet, physical activity or both for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at… 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.