Cochrane · systematic review · CD010873

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children

Ng, RT, Lee, WS, Ang, HL, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Gut2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation for treating chronic constipation in children

Population: children with chronic constipation
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants with improved complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) of greater than three times per week at two‐month
RR 1.07 [0.74, 1.53]1 study · 42 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of participants with improved colonic transit
RR 5 [0.79, 31.63]1 study · 21 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Colonic transit rate (geometric centre of radioactive substance). Unit indicates position along with intestinal tract. Scale from: 1 (small intestine) to 5 (rectosigmoid area).
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of participants with improved symptoms related to soiling
RR 2.08 [0.86, 5]1 study · 25 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of participants with improved quality of life
RR 4 [0.56, 28.4]1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Self‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using Peds QL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life)
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Parent‐perceived QoL (change from baseline) measured using PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales, scoring 0‐100 points, higher score indicates better quality of life)
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness