Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42909097

Selenium supplementation for preventing cancer therapy-related toxicities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Chang Chuyue, Wei Juncheng, Li Mengfei, et al. · Frontiers in nutrition · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fnut.2026.1940806

Findings

58 findings

Population
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carePrimary: severe oral mucositis, head-and-neck RT/CRT
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.88 [0.35, 2.23]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careoral mucositis onset in daysMD 0.98 [-0.44, 2.39]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision
2 studies · 131 participants
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carePrimary: severe oral mucositis, head-and-neck RT/CRT
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 1.10 [0.78, 1.57]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carePrimary: severe oral mucositis, head-and-neck RT/CRT
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.73 [0.34, 1.56]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: oral mucositis onset in days
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
MD 0.84 [-10.70, 12.38]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard caresevere oral mucositis, head-and-neck RT/CRTRR 0.89 [0.50, 1.56]
-49 [-218, +248] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies · 188 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe oral mucositis, expanded contexts
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.71 [0.30, 1.67]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe oral mucositis, expanded contexts
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.58 [0.27, 1.25]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe oral mucositis, expanded contexts
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.64 [0.25, 1.64]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careSevere oral mucositis with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.80 [0.44, 1.48]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careSevere oral mucositis with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.83 [0.56, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careoral mucositis duration in daysMD -1.72 [-2.64, -0.80]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision
2 studies · 145 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careany oral mucositisRR 0.98 [0.91, 1.05]
-17 [-78, +49] per 1000
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 145 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: any oral mucositis
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.98 [0.91, 1.05]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: any oral mucositis
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.98 [0.91, 1.05]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: any oral mucositis
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.98 [0.77, 1.24]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard caresevere oral mucositis, expanded contextsRR 0.71 [0.38, 1.33]
-119 [-256, +136] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
5 studies · 262 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: oral mucositis duration in days
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
MD -1.72 [-4.06, 0.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carebroad toxicity-prevention poolRR 0.60 [0.42, 0.83]
Very low
Downgraded: indirectness
11 studies · 745 participants
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: broad toxicity-prevention pool
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.60 [0.40, 0.89]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe broad toxicity
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.70 [0.40, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe broad toxicity
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.64 [0.41, 1.01]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard caregrade 3 hematologic toxicityRR 0.70 [0.50, 0.97]
-173 [-286, -16] per 1000
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 138 participants
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: broad toxicity-prevention pool
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.59 [0.40, 0.88]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careBroad toxicity-prevention pool with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.65 [0.44, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: grade 3 hematologic toxicity
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.70 [0.50, 0.97]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: expanded hematologic toxicity
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.70 [0.49, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: expanded hematologic toxicity
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.70 [0.50, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard caresevere broad toxicityRR 0.71 [0.46, 1.09]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
7 studies · 452 participants
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: grade 3 hematologic toxicity
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.70 [0.50, 0.97]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careBroad toxicity-prevention pool with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.66 [0.48, 0.90]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: grade 3 hematologic toxicity
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.70 [0.46, 1.06]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: severe broad toxicity
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.73 [0.45, 1.18]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: expanded hematologic toxicity
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.71 [0.51, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: broad toxicity-prevention pool
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.58 [0.34, 1.02]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed therapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careexpanded hematologic toxicityRR 0.70 [0.50, 0.96]
-115 [-188, -14] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: indirectness
4 studies · 242 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: diarrhea event
Placebo-controlled studies only
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: diarrhea event
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.70 [0.002, 204.19]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: gastrointestinal toxicity or diarrhea
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.70 [0.42, 1.16]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carediarrhea eventRR 0.60 [0.37, 0.98]
-121 [-191, -7] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies · 185 participants
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careDiarrhea with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.60 [0.39, 0.94]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: diarrhea event
High-risk studies excluded
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careDiarrhea with conference-abstract augmentation
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.60 [0.23, 1.56]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: gastrointestinal toxicity or diarrhea
Placebo-controlled studies only
no estimate extracted
GRADE not reported
1 study
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: gastrointestinal toxicity or diarrhea
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.61 [0.28, 1.33]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard caregastrointestinal toxicity or diarrheaRR 0.61 [0.42, 0.88]
-142 [-208, -45] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
3 studies · 271 participants
Cancer patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: renal toxicity event
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.31 [0.10, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: renal toxicity event
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.27 [8.59e-06, 8202.54]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carerenal toxicity eventRR 0.31 [0.10, 1.00]
-98 [-129, +0] per 1000
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 196 participants
Cancer patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapySelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: renal toxicity event
Placebo-controlled studies only
RR 0.31 [0.10, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed treatmentSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carepain grade >=2
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
RR 0.78 [0.64, 0.95]
-169 [-279, -35] per 1000
Low
2 studies · 146 participants
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed treatmentSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: pain grade >=2
REML heterogeneity estimator with Hartung-Knapp
RR 0.74 [0.09, 5.98]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed treatmentSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careExploratory: pain grade >=2
High-risk studies excluded
RR 0.78 [0.64, 0.95]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Patients receiving high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careSevere oral mucositis in transplant settings
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.62 [3.88e-04, 977.21]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Patients receiving high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantationSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard careSevere oral mucositis in transplant settings
Adds Orvain 2025 conference-abstract arm-level data
RR 0.90 [0.66, 1.22]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Pelvic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapyNo seleniumSelenium supplementationPelvic chemoradiotherapy grade 2-3 diarrhea
Combines reported Bahador OR with reconstructed Muecke category-contrast OR
OR 3.76 [1.78, 7.94]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Pelvic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapyNo seleniumSelenium supplementationPelvic chemoradiotherapy grade 2-3 diarrhea
Combines reported Bahador OR with reconstructed Muecke category-contrast OR
OR 3.76 [1.51, 9.33]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Cancer patients receiving cancer-directed treatmentSelenium supplementation during cancer therapyPlacebo, no selenium, observation or selenium-free standard carePain grade >=2
Placebo-controlled studies only
no estimate extracted
No studies found
0 studies

Included primary studies 34

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Wang 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR5 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Song 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ameri 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Asfour 2006
Effect of high-dose sodium selenite therapy on polymorphonuclear leukocyte apoptosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.
PMID:16679545
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bahador 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Brodin 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Buentzel 2010
Limited effects of selenium substitution in the prevention of radiation-associated toxicities. results of a randomized study in head and…
PMID:20592387
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2023
The effect of selenium yeast in the prevention of adverse reactions related to platinum-based combination therapy in patients with…
PMID:37975373
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Corcoran 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Evans 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fakih 2006
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fakih 2008
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ghorbani 2013
Protective effect of selenium on cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity: A double-blind controlled randomized clinical trial.
PMID:24475439
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hu 1997
The protective role of selenium on the toxicity of cisplatin-contained chemotherapy regimen in cancer patients.
PMID:9197929
1997this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jahangard-Rafsanjani 2013
The efficacy of selenium in prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic SCT: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:23292233
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Knox 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Laali 2020
Effect of Selenium on Incidence and Severity of Mucositis during Radiotherapy in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
PMID:32895660
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Micke 2003
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mix 2015
Randomized phase II trial of selenomethionine as a modulator of efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the…
PMID:26468453
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mix/Rajan 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Muecke 2010
Multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing selenium supplementation with observation in gynecologic radiation oncology.
PMID:20133068
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Orvain 2025
Intravenous selenium to prevent oral mucositis in patients with lymphoma or myeloma undergoing high-dose therapy followed by autologous…
DOI:10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.12091
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Orvain 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pavlidis 2026
A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Zinc and Selenium Supplementation for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer…
DOI:10.1007/s12070-026-06424-9
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pavlidis 2026
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rajan 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sieja 2004
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Son 2017
Effect of selenium supplementation for protection of salivary glands from iodine-131 radiation damage in patients with differentiated…
PMID:28315910
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vieira 2015
Supplementation with selenium can influence nausea, fatigue, physical, renal, and liver function of children and adolescents with cancer.
PMID:25379637
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2020
DOI:10.13267/j.cnki.syzlzz.2020.06.014
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2023
Effects of selenium supplementation on concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer: A randomized, double-blind,…
PMID:36819673
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yim 2026
Efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of high-dose selenium for preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in…
PMID:41630017
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zakharia 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zimmermann 2005
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with cancer receiving cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with HSCT, radioiodine therapy)Patients with head-and-neck, cervical, gynecologic, pelvic, ovarian, hematologic and other cancers receiving RT, CRT, chemotherapy, HSCT or radioiodine (n=17 main-analysis studies; 1,063 participants)
InterventionSelenium supplementation with selenium-specific attributionIntravenous sodium selenite pentahydrate, oral sodium selenite, selenium yeast, L-selenomethionine, selenium-glycine, seleno-kappa-carrageenan and other oral selenium (n=17)
ComparisonPlacebo, no selenium, observation, or standard care without seleniumPlacebo, no selenium/observation, or standard care without selenium (n=17)
OutcomesPrimary: severe (grade 3 or higher) oral mucositis during head-and-neck RT/CRT. Other efficacy: treatment-related toxicities, severity or duration, validated toxicity scores (expanded and any oral mucositis, mucositis duration and onset, hematologic toxicity, diarrhea, gastrointestinal toxicity, renal toxicity, pain, severe broad toxicity, broad toxicity pool). Safety: selenium-attributed adverse events, serious adverse events, dose-limiting toxicity, treatment interruption or completion. Contextual: quality of life, nutrition, performance, selenium status, tumor response, survivalSevere oral mucositis head-and-neck RT/CRT (n=4); expanded severe oral mucositis (n=5); any oral mucositis (n=2); mucositis duration (n=2); onset (n=2); grade 3 hematologic toxicity (n=2); expanded hematologic toxicity (n=4); diarrhea (n=2); gastrointestinal toxicity or diarrhea (n=3); renal toxicity (n=2); pain grade 2 or higher (n=2); severe broad toxicity (n=7); broad toxicity pool (n=11); CIPN, salivary gland injury and taste single-study only
Study designsComparative clinical trials (randomized and older comparative clinical studies); phase I, single-arm, conference reports mapped as supplementary evidenceRandomized trials (double-blind placebo-controlled, open-label, crossover, phase II/pilot) (n=17 main); 13 supplementary study groups
TimingDuring cancer therapyDuring cancer therapy

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedYesYesyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallHighHighyes