Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42652796

Clinical Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Endodontic Microsurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valdivieso Del Pueblo Carlos, Montero-Miralles Paloma, León-López María, et al. · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/jcm15166392

Findings

Population Patients undergoing endodontic microsurgery (periapical surgery) for periapical lesions of endodontic origin

2 findings

Platelet-rich fibrin or its derivatives (L-PRF, A-PRF, A-PRF+, i-PRF, PRF membrane) as adjunct to endodontic microsurgeryEndodontic microsurgery without PRF (conventional surgery/control)Clinical-radiographic healing successOR 1.223 [0.303, 4.931]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 96 participants
Platelet-rich fibrin or its derivatives (L-PRF, A-PRF, A-PRF+, i-PRF, PRF membrane) as adjunct to endodontic microsurgeryEndodontic microsurgery without PRF (conventional surgery/control)Early postoperative pain (VAS)
First postoperative week
SMD -0.617 [-1.026, -0.208]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
3 studies · 120 participants

Included primary studies 17

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Gulsever 2025
Apicoectomy versus apical curettage in combination with or without L-PRF application: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:40057596
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Karan 2020
Assessment of bone healing after mineral trioxide aggregate and platelet-rich fibrin application in periapical lesions using cone-beam…
PMID:31321573
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Karkle 2025
Impact of Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Early Bone Healing After Endodontic Microsurgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:40075764
20251 other reviewClinical-radiographic healing successnot extracted yet
Soto-Penaloza 2020
Pain and quality of life after endodontic surgery with or without advanced platelet-rich fibrin membrane application: a randomized…
PMID:31612327
20201 other reviewEarly postoperative pain (VAS)not extracted yet
Tiwari 2021
Comparative analysis of platelet-rich fibrin, platelet-rich fibrin with hydroxyapatite and platelet-rich fibrin with alendronate in bone…
PMID:33623234
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
You 2023
Volumetric evaluation of effects of platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factor on early bone healing after endodontic…
PMID:37899448
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Arpitha 2023
Efficacy of mixture of injectable-platelet-rich fibrin and type-1 collagen particles on the closure of through-and-through periapical bone…
PMID:37418583
2023this review onlyClinical-radiographic healing successnot extracted yet
Bhardwaj 2025
Platelet rich fibrin versus hydroxyapatite in the management of periapical inflammatory lesions: A prospective clinico-radiographic…
DOI:10.1016/j.ajoms.2025.03.005
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dhiman 2015
Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin on Healing of Apicomarginal Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:25963290
2015this review onlyClinical-radiographic healing successnot extracted yet
Kavitha 2024
Comparative evaluation of platelet-rich plasma + β-tricalcium phosphate and platelet-rich fibrin + β-tricalcium phosphate for healing…
PMID:39502761
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kumar 2026
Two-dimensional and three-dimensional evaluation of bone regeneration using platelet-rich fibrin versus bone putty in large periapical…
PMID:41940358
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Major 2025
PRF Membranes Enhance Postoperative Recovery After Periapical Surgery: A Single-Blind Randomized Pilot Trial Using 3D Imaging
DOI:10.3390/oral5040098
2025this review onlyEarly postoperative pain (VAS)not extracted yet
Meschi 2018
Root-end surgery with leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin and an occlusive membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial on patients'…
PMID:29524025
2018this review onlyEarly postoperative pain (VAS)not extracted yet
Meschi 2020
Multi-modular bone healing assessment in a randomized controlled clinical trial of root-end surgery with the use of leukocyte- and…
PMID:32418011
2020this review onlyEarly postoperative pain (VAS)not extracted yet
Monga 2016
A comparative clinical study to evaluate the healing of large periapical lesions using platelet-rich fibrin and hydroxyapatite
DOI:10.4103/0970-7212.184336
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Singh 2020
Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Granules, CERAMENT™, and Platelet-rich Fibrin in the Management of Endodontic Apical Surgery.
PMID:32690839
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thanikasalam 2018
Evaluation of healing after periapical surgery using platelet-rich fibrin and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite with collagen in combination…
DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_55_17
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients of any age undergoing endodontic microsurgery or periapical surgery for periapical lesions of endodontic originPatients with persistent or chronic apical periodontitis, large, apicomarginal and through-and-through periapical defects (16 datasets)
InterventionPRF or derivatives (PRF, L-PRF, A-PRF, A-PRF+, i-PRF), alone or combined with biomaterialsPRF, L-PRF, A-PRF, A-PRF+, i-PRF and PRF combined with hydroxyapatite, collagen, beta-TCP or alendronate
ComparisonSurgery without PRF, spontaneous clot healing, hydroxyapatite, MTA, membranes, PRP, CGF, CERAMENT, bone putty or other active biomaterialsSurgery without PRF, empty defect/clot, hydroxyapatite, CGF, bone putty, CERAMENT, MTA, membranes, PRP
OutcomesPrimary: CBCT bone regeneration and radiographic healing; secondary: postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, edema, quality of life, soft-tissue healing, periodontal parameters, bone density, clinical-radiographic successPostoperative pain (n=3 pooled); clinical-radiographic success (n=3 pooled); edema, quality of life, 2D radiographic healing, CBCT volumetric regeneration, bone density, complex defects (narrative)
Study designsRCTs, prospective comparative clinical studies, parallel-group or split-mouth designs10 RCTs and 6 non-randomized comparative studies (reports/datasets as listed in Table 2)
TimingNot specified7 days to 12 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes