Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42396093

Assessment of temporomandibular joint morphological alterations after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Azees Rasha, Sarika K, James Anju, et al. · Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2026.101483

Findings

15 findings

Population
Adults with skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular advancement)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementSuperior joint space
1 year (long-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class II
SMD 0.46 [-0.08, 1.0]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 67 participants
Adults with skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular advancement)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementPosterior joint space
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class II
SMD 0.42 [-0.05, 0.9]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 67 participants
Adults with skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular advancement)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementSuperior joint space
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class II
SMD -0.35 [-1.72, 1.02]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 67 participants
Adults with skeletal Class II malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular advancement)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementPosterior joint space
12-18 months (long-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class II
SMD 0.97 [0.61, 1.33]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 67 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementPosterior joint space
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD -0.72 [-1.68, 0.23]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 61 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementSuperior joint space
1 year (long-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.26 [-0.14, 0.67]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 47 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementSuperior joint space
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD -0.57 [-1.45, 0.31]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 61 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementAnterior joint space
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD -0.03 [-0.38, 0.33]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 61 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementCondylar height
1 year (long-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.37 [0.08, 0.66]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 93 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementPosterior joint space
2-8 months (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD -0.26 [-0.63, 0.1]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 115 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementCondylar height
Within 1 month (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.12 [-0.17, 0.4]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 96 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementPosterior joint space
12-18 months (long-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.23 [-0.17, 0.64]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 47 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementAxial condylar axis angle
1-2 weeks (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.77 [0.44, 1.1]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 76 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementSuperior joint space
6-8 months (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD 0.04 [-0.25, 0.34]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 104 participants
Adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion undergoing BSSRO (mandibular setback)BSSRO (post-surgery TMJ measurement)Pre-surgery (baseline) TMJ measurementAnterior joint space
6-8 months (short-term) · Orthognathic surgery, 3D imaging (CBCT, CT, MRI) · Class III
SMD -0.21 [-0.83, 0.41]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 87 participants

Included primary studies 29

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Chen 2013
Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination…
PMID:23973047
2013this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint spacenot extracted yet
Fang 2009
Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
PMID:19375280
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gulcek 2023
Changes in the condylar head after orthognathic surgery in Class III patients: a retrospective three-dimensional study.
PMID:36409284
2023this review onlyAxial condylar axis angle; Condylar heightnot extracted yet
Hupp 2023
Modeling the effect of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on posterior, superior and medial space dimensions of the temporomandibular…
PMID:37198590
2023this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint spacenot extracted yet
Iguchi 2017
Comparison of temporomandibular joint and ramus morphology between class II and class III cases before and after bi-maxillary osteotomy.
PMID:29046240
2017this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint space; Condylar heightnot extracted yet
Kawamata 1998
Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of postsurgical condylar displacement after mandibular osteotomy.
PMID:9574943
1998this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kikuta 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kikuta 2024
Mechanism of reactivation and refolding of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from yeast after denaturation and dissociation.
PMID:202463
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim 2009
Changes in the temporomandibular joint disc position after orthognathic surgery.
PMID:19451004
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim 2010
The assessment of the short‐ and long‐term changes in the condylar position following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid…
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02056.x
2010this review onlyAxial condylar axis anglenot extracted yet
Kim 2010
The assessment of the short- and long-term changes in the condylar position following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid…
PMID:20113391
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim 2011
Cone-beam computerized tomography evaluation of condylar changes and stability following two-jaw surgery: Le Fort I osteotomy and…
PMID:21055977
2011this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint space; Anterior joint space; Axial condylar axis anglenot extracted yet
Kim 2024
Quantitative determination of myoinositol, inositol 1-phosphate, inositol cyclic 1 : 2-phosphate and glycerylphosphoinositol in normal and…
PMID:202462
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lekroengsin 2023
Relationship between Changes in Condylar Morphology and Masticatory Muscle Volume after Skeletal Class II Surgery.
PMID:37510990
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Luo 2023
Changes of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology and Symptoms in Class II Malocclusion Patients With Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramous Osteotomy.
PMID:37801718
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ma 2019
Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.
PMID:31145325
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ma 2020
Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images from cone beam…
PMID:31728734
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mavreas 1992
Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery.
PMID:1563472
1992this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint space; Anterior joint spacenot extracted yet
Panpitakkul 2024
Three-Dimensional Changes of Condylar Position After Bimaxillary Surgery to Correct Skeletal III Malocclusion: Cone Beam Computed…
PMID:38889883
2024this review onlyPosterior joint spacenot extracted yet
Ren 2023
Effect of the magnitude of condylar head displacement on the TMJ function in skeletal class II patients undergoing different degrees of…
PMID:37352620
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sobouti 2022
Short-term and long-term alterations of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback: A…
PMID:35308442
2022this review onlySuperior joint space; Posterior joint space; Anterior joint spacenot extracted yet
Takahara 2016
MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation.
PMID:27077250
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ueki 2007
Condylar and disc positions after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
PMID:17321444
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ueki 2008
Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation.
PMID:18602292
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ueki 2009
Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with…
PMID:19699116
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ueki 2020
Change of lateral pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular disc position after bi-maxillary surgery in class II and III patients.
PMID:32661575
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ueki 2021
Computed tomography assessment of mandibular morphologic changes and the inferior mandibular border defect after sagittal split ramus…
PMID:34274287
2021this review onlyCondylar heightnot extracted yet
Ueki 2023
Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery.
PMID:37280442
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yin 2019
Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and…
PMID:31623933
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdult patients undergoing orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class II or Class III malocclusion; excluded facial asymmetry or pre-existing TMJ disordersAdults with skeletal Class II (179 patients) and Class III (568 patients) malocclusion; 872 patients across all studies
InterventionBSSRO for mandibular advancement (Class II) or setback (Class III), alone or with maxillary procedures; surgery-first and orthodontics-first protocolsBSSRO (some with Le Fort I or IVRO); CBCT, CT or MRI assessment
ComparisonPre-surgery (baseline) measurementsPre-surgery measurements in the same patients
OutcomesTMJ morphology on 3D imaging: joint space, condylar height, condylar axial angle, disc position, masseter/lateral pterygoid muscle changes; glenoid fossa changes added as outcomePooled: superior, posterior and anterior joint space, axial condylar axis angle, condylar height (10 studies); narrative: condylar position, disc position, masseter and pterygoid muscle changes (16 studies)
Study designsCross-sectional, quasi-experimental and cohort studies; RCTs not included26 studies: 11 analytical cross-sectional, 8 quasi-experimental, 7 cohort; 10 in meta-analysis
TimingShort-term (<1 year) and long-term (>1 year) follow-upFollow-up from 1-2 weeks to 1 year or more

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: NoNRSI: No · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes