Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42245173

Clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy versus root canal treatment in immature permanent teeth with pulpal involvement: a meta-analysis.

Gu Siji, Yang Yuyun · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fped.2026.1754580

Findings

Population Immature permanent teeth with pulpal involvement

14 findings

Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Follow-up >=24 months · Follow-up duration >=24 months
OR 2.03 [1.21, 3.41]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months) · Sensitivity analysis: excluding observational cohort with traumatic pulp exposure
OR 2.03 [1.18, 3.49]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: Immature tooth (Yes = 1)
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.62 [0.11, 1.13]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months)
OR 1.37 [1.06, 1.78]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: Follow-up duration (per month)
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.03 [0.01, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: Hydraulic bioceramic material
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.48 [-0.03, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: Caries etiology (vs. trauma)
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.51 [-0.08, 1.11]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: RCT design (vs. cohort)
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.41 [-0.15, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months) · Sensitivity analysis: omitting the PMTA/CEM pulpotomy trial
OR 1.74 [1.01, 3.03]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Follow-up <12 months · Follow-up duration <12 months
OR 1.41 [0.79, 2.51]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentDeterminants of VPT effectiveness (meta-regression)
Covariate: Complete/coronal pulpotomy
Meta-regression coefficient (log OR) 0.57 [0.04, 1.10]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months) · Tooth maturity: immature teeth
OR 3.01 [1.43, 6.33]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Complete or coronal pulpotomyRoot canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months) · VPT type: complete/coronal pulpotomy
OR 2.47 [1.11, 5.51]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping)Root canal treatmentOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)
Longest follow-up (at least 12 months) · Etiology of pulpal involvement (caries vs trauma; stratum not specified in text)
OR 2.12 [1.05, 4.28]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 8

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Asgary 2022
Outcomes of root canal therapy or full pulpotomy using two endodontic biomaterials in mature permanent teeth: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:34854987
20223 other reviewsOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)not extracted yet
Alyahya 2024
Optimal outcomes of pulpotomy in young patients: Long-term prospects for permanent molars with signs and symptoms indicative of…
PMID:38901324
2024this review onlyOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)not extracted yet
Asgary 2014
Two-year results of vital pulp therapy in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis: an ongoing multicenter randomized clinical trial.
PMID:23712823
2014this review onlyOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)not extracted yet
Babasidou 2025
Selective caries removal and management of exposed pulp in fully developed and immature teeth with reversible pulpitis: a…
PMID:40423766
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kalantzis 2024
The management of deep carious lesions and the exposed pulp in fully developed and immature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a…
PMID:38844571
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2023
Endodontic treatments on permanent teeth in pediatric patients aged 6-12 years old.
PMID:37404642
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shahmohammadi 2021
Treatment Outcomes of Permanent Immature Teeth with Crown Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
PMID:34478786
2021this review onlyOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)not extracted yet
Zheng 2025
Outcomes of partial pulpotomy in permanent molars of children with irreversible pulpitis: A prospective cohort study.
PMID:39255508
2025this review onlyOverall treatment success (clinical and radiographic)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with immature permanent teeth (incomplete root formation, open apices) with pulpal involvement from caries, trauma, restorative procedures or mixed etiologyImmature and mixed-maturity permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis or traumatic pulp exposure (n=482 teeth in 5 studies with tooth-level data)
InterventionVital pulp therapy: direct or indirect pulp capping, partial, cervical, full or coronal pulpotomy; any biomaterialPartial, cervical, complete or coronal pulpotomy with MTA, CEM, PMTA or premixed bioceramic materials
ComparisonConventional root canal treatment, including apexification or apical barrier proceduresConventional root canal treatment
OutcomesPrimary: overall treatment success (composite clinical and radiographic). Secondary: clinical success, radiographic success, tooth survival, complicationsOverall treatment success (OR, n=3 comparative studies pooled)
Study designsRandomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts, case-control studies8 studies included (2 RCTs, 3 clinical cohorts, 3 non-comparative); 5 with tooth-level data
TimingLongest follow-up of at least 12 monthsFollow-up 6 to 24 months in controlled studies; over 10 years in one cohort