Primary study · included by 1 review

Optimal outcomes of pulpotomy in young patients: Long-term prospects for permanent molars with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis.

Alyahya 2024 · Alyahya Asma, Qudeimat Muawia A · Journal of dentistry · 2024

Included by

Clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy versus root canal treatment in immature permanent teeth with pulpal involvement: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Alyahya 2024 · Table 2; Reference 27

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Overall treatment success (clinical and radiographic) Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping) vs Root canal treatment · Follow-up >=24 months	OR 2.03 [1.21, 3.41]	NR	GRADE not reported
Overall treatment success (clinical and radiographic) Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping) vs Root canal treatment · Longest follow-up (at least 12 months)	OR 2.03 [1.18, 3.49]	NR	GRADE not reported
Overall treatment success (clinical and radiographic) Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping) vs Root canal treatment · Longest follow-up (at least 12 months)	OR 1.37 [1.06, 1.78]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Overall treatment success (clinical and radiographic) Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping) vs Root canal treatment · Longest follow-up (at least 12 months)	OR 1.74 [1.01, 3.03]	NR	GRADE not reported
Overall treatment success (clinical and radiographic) Vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulp capping) vs Root canal treatment · Follow-up <12 months	OR 1.41 [0.79, 2.51]	NR	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.