Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42054790

Effect of Micro-Osteoperforations on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Heidari Ali, Mojiri Sepideh, Azarbayjani Masood, et al. · International dental journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2026.109536

Findings

198 findings

Population
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design and total perforations: <=3 in split-mouth studies
SMD 0.67 [0.19, 1.14]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design and total perforations: >3 in split-mouth studies
SMD 2.21 [0.77, 3.64]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Attachment lossMD -0.26 [-0.86, 0.33]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · OTM measurement: Digital caliper
SMD 2.43 [1.70, 3.16]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Depth and jaw: less than 5 mm in maxilla and mandible
SMD 2.36 [1.44, 3.29]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Type of bracket: group without a label in the forest plot
SMD 2.59 [1.54, 3.64]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Perforation on palatal side: No
SMD 1.60 [1.10, 2.10]
GRADE not reported
26 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Jaw: Mandible
MD 2.05 [-1.44, 5.54]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Meta-regression: total number of perforations
Meta-regression coefficient 0.463 [0.249, 0.677]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Working wire dimension: 0.016 x 0.022
SMD 1.03 [0.58, 1.47]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: TAD or appliance reference (C-TAD/Appliance)
MD 0.29 [-0.12, 0.70]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Type of OTM: Alignment
SMD 1.58 [0.64, 2.51]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Alqadasi et al., 2024
SMD 1.703 [1.234, 2.172]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Pain change from baseline (VAS)
24 hours
MD -0.13 [-0.63, 0.36]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Alqadasi et al., 2024
SMD 1.616 [1.147, 2.086]
GRADE not reported
29 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Root resorption (mm)MD 0.01 [-0.04, 0.07]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Venkatachalapathy et al., 2022
SMD 1.601 [1.093, 2.109]
GRADE not reported
24 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Selective reporting (RoB 1): Unclear risk
SMD 2.35 [1.45, 3.26]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting GOWDA S V et al., 2019
SMD 1.632 [1.160, 2.105]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Alfailany et al., 2023
SMD 1.669 [1.162, 2.176]
GRADE not reported
25 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and total perforations: >=5 mm and <=3
SMD 0.27 [-0.01, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw and type of OTM: Maxillary and mandibular canine retraction
SMD 1.91 [1.27, 2.55]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: available change SDs
SMD 1.82 [1.29, 2.35]
GRADE not reported
24 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Fattori et al., 2020
SMD 2.004 [1.174, 2.834]
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Random sequence generation (RoB 1): Unclear risk
SMD 2.07 [1.16, 2.99]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Aboalga et al., 2019
SMD 3.129 [1.604, 4.654]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Palatal perforation: No
MD 1.14 [-0.39, 2.67]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: >3, <5 mm in maxilla
SMD 1.39 [0.17, 2.61]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and instrument: >=5 mm with miniscrew/mini-implant
SMD 0.75 [-0.19, 1.70]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Perforation depth: <5 mm
SMD 1.77 [1.25, 2.29]
GRADE not reported
19 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: calculated average across parts of tooth
SMD 3.84 [1.93, 5.75]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations and jaw: >3 in mandible
SMD 2.07 [0.93, 3.21]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Type of bracket: MBT
SMD 1.69 [1.01, 2.37]
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Kilinc and Baka, 2023
SMD 1.689 [1.214, 2.163]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Aboalga et al., 2019
SMD 1.697 [1.223, 2.171]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Gingival indexSMD 0.06 [-0.79, 0.91]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Ahsan et al., 2021
SMD 1.756 [1.074, 2.437]
GRADE not reported
17 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Repeat of MOP: No
SMD 1.73 [1.28, 2.17]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Attri et al., 2018
SMD 1.649 [1.171, 2.127]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Selective reporting (RoB 1): Low risk
SMD 1.36 [0.84, 1.88]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Gulduren et al., 2020
SMD 1.856 [1.070, 2.643]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and instrument: >=5 mm with Propel
SMD 0.58 [-0.23, 1.39]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Jaw: mandible
SMD 2.07 [0.93, 3.21]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: >3, >=5 mm in mandible
SMD 2.43 [-0.38, 5.24]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Alqadasi et al., 2019
SMD 1.701 [1.232, 2.170]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: >3, <5 mm in mandible
SMD 2.26 [0.36, 4.16]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting El Awady et al., 2019
SMD 1.679 [1.204, 2.154]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Pain change from baseline (VAS)
24 hours
SMD -0.15 [-0.44, 0.14]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · WHO region: EMRO
SMD 2.10 [1.16, 3.04]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Meta-regression: distance between perforations (mm)
Meta-regression coefficient -0.431 [-1.100, 0.239]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Blinding of outcome assessment (RoB 1): Unclear risk
SMD 1.27 [0.64, 1.89]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Golshah et al., 2021
SMD 1.652 [1.016, 2.289]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Malocclusion: Class I only
SMD 2.12 [0.74, 3.50]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: model-based custom references (C-Model)
SMD 0.63 [0.10, 1.16]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations and jaw: <=3 in maxilla
SMD 1.58 [0.88, 2.27]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: TAD or appliance reference (C-TAD/Appliance)
SMD 0.65 [-0.40, 1.70]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Ozkan et al., 2021
SMD 1.659 [1.185, 2.133]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · WHO region: PAHO
SMD 2.41 [-0.17, 4.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design and total perforations: >3 in parallel-arm studies
SMD 1.76 [0.83, 2.68]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: calculated average across perforation numbers
SMD 2.44 [-0.32, 5.21]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Kilinc and Baka, 2023
SMD 1.616 [1.128, 2.105]
GRADE not reported
26 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · WHO region: WPRO
SMD 0.05 [-0.40, 0.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Type of OTM: Canine retraction
SMD 1.75 [1.20, 2.31]
GRADE not reported
22 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis: omitting Mordente et al., 2024
SMD 1.700 [1.228, 2.173]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Risk of bias, incomplete outcome data: low risk
SMD 1.68 [1.20, 2.15]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Meta-regression: female percentage
Meta-regression coefficient -0.039 [-0.157, 0.079]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Ozkan et al., 2021
SMD 1.624 [1.018, 2.231]
GRADE not reported
19 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Probing pocket depthMD 0.19 [-0.63, 1.00]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: extraction space (EXT)
SMD 1.96 [0.08, 3.84]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to GOWDA S V et al., 2019
SMD 2.218 [1.265, 3.171]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Gingival indexMD 0.03 [-0.30, 0.37]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Study design: Parallel arms
MD 1.65 [-1.08, 4.37]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design and total perforations: <=3 in parallel-arm studies
SMD 3.05 [1.71, 4.39]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Al-Attar et al., 2022
SMD 1.664 [1.101, 2.227]
GRADE not reported
21 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Instrument for MOP: Propel
SMD 2.97 [1.44, 4.49]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to RAGHAV et al., 2020
SMD 1.736 [1.021, 2.451]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · WHO region: SEARO
SMD 2.07 [1.42, 2.71]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Working wire dimension: 0.017 x 0.025
SMD 1.04 [0.12, 1.97]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Al-Attar et al., 2022
SMD 1.585 [1.124, 2.046]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Palatal perforation: Yes
MD 0.63 [0.19, 1.06]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Gulduren et al., 2020
SMD 1.700 [1.230, 2.170]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Blinding of outcome assessment (RoB 1): Low risk
SMD 1.41 [0.95, 1.86]
GRADE not reported
25 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Perforation on palatal side: Yes
SMD 1.87 [0.56, 3.19]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: calculated change SDs (r=0.5)
SMD 1.07 [0.09, 2.04]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations and jaw: >3 in maxilla
SMD 1.13 [0.09, 2.16]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and total perforations: <5 mm and <=3
SMD 1.44 [0.83, 2.05]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: canine to second premolar (C2P)
SMD 1.05 [0.43, 1.66]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Venkatachalapathy et al., 2022
SMD 1.605 [1.140, 2.070]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: canine to lateral incisor (CL)
SMD 4.94 [3.09, 6.79]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Ahsan et al., 2021
SMD 1.626 [1.155, 2.098]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Allocation concealment (RoB 1): Low risk
SMD 1.47 [0.85, 2.09]
GRADE not reported
19 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · WHO region: EURO
SMD 0.73 [0.21, 1.26]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Pain change from baseline (VAS)
7 days
MD 0.79 [-5.28, 6.85]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Meta-regression: number of MOP repeats
Meta-regression coefficient 0.536 [0.042, 1.031]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Instrument: Miniscrew/mini-implant
MD 0.57 [0.11, 1.04]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Alikhani et al., 2013
SMD 1.521 [1.075, 1.966]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: canine to lateral incisor (CL)
MD 0.65 [0.38, 0.93]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Kundi et al., 2018
SMD 1.402 [1.002, 1.803]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Alfailany et al., 2023
SMD 1.588 [1.127, 2.050]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Meta-regression: mean age (years)
Meta-regression coefficient -0.186 [-0.369, -0.003]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Malocclusion: Other
SMD 1.05 [0.10, 2.00]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Jaw: Maxilla
MD 0.14 [-0.59, 0.87]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Thomas et al., 2021
SMD 1.675 [1.192, 2.158]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: >3, <5 mm in maxilla and mandible
SMD 3.47 [1.68, 5.25]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design: Parallel arms
SMD 2.27 [1.50, 3.04]
GRADE not reported
17 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Jaw and type of tooth movement: mandibular alignment
SMD 1.71 [0.64, 2.78]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: Little's Irregularity Index (LII)
MD 1.24 [1.06, 1.43]
High
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Meta-regression: study duration (weeks), MOP not repeated
Meta-regression coefficient -0.170 [-0.250, -0.087]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Golshah et al., 2021
SMD 1.697 [1.220, 2.174]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Publication bias: Egger regression test
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Egger test intercept 8.91
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Perforation depth: >=5 mm
SMD 0.63 [0.00, 1.26]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Meta-regression: study duration (weeks), MOP repeated
Meta-regression coefficient -0.137 [-0.250, -0.024]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and total perforations: >=5 mm and >3
SMD 1.63 [-0.41, 3.67]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Meta-regression: study duration (weeks), all studies
Meta-regression coefficient -0.168 [-0.228, -0.096]
GRADE not reported
39 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: any calculated average or pooled SD
SMD 2.96 [1.97, 3.94]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: <=3, <5 mm in maxilla
SMD 1.45 [0.68, 2.21]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Malocclusion: Class II only
SMD 3.06 [1.33, 4.80]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Meta-regression: perforation diameter (mm)
Meta-regression coefficient -2.762 [-5.185, 0.338]
GRADE not reported
27 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure
SMD 0.37 [-0.35, 1.08]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Rashid et al., 2018
SMD 1.661 [1.188, 2.135]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Type of bracket: Roth
SMD 0.51 [0.17, 0.85]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and jaw: <5 mm in mandible
SMD 2.26 [0.36, 4.16]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Female proportion: >60%
SMD 1.30 [0.55, 2.05]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Al-Hayek et al., 2019
SMD 1.675 [1.201, 2.149]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Alkebsi et al., 2018
SMD 1.706 [1.238, 2.174]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Li et al., 2022
SMD 1.585 [1.044, 2.127]
GRADE not reported
22 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and instrument: <5 mm with miniscrew/mini-implant
SMD 1.78 [1.22, 2.33]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Malocclusion: Mixed/multiple
SMD 1.21 [0.64, 1.78]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw: Maxilla
SMD 1.43 [0.86, 2.00]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Singh et al., 2023
SMD 1.559 [1.106, 2.012]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Measured distance: Little's Irregularity Index (LII)
SMD 1.71 [0.64, 2.78]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and jaw: <5 mm in maxilla
SMD 1.42 [0.81, 2.03]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: <=3, >=5 mm in maxilla
SMD 0.30 [-0.01, 0.60]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Kumar et al., 2024
SMD 1.700 [1.228, 2.173]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Probing pocket depthSMD 0.60 [-2.00, 3.20]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: available average (no averaging across arms, sites or jaws)
SMD 1.00 [0.57, 1.43]
GRADE not reported
19 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Feizbakhsh et al., 2018
SMD 1.656 [1.180, 2.133]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and jaw: >=5 mm in mandible
SMD 2.43 [-0.38, 5.24]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Trim-and-fill (observed plus imputed studies; 0 imputed)
SMD 1.128 [0.994, 1.262]
GRADE not reported
39 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis: omitting Fattori et al., 2020
SMD 1.699 [1.229, 2.169]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · OTM measurement: Digital scanning
SMD 0.97 [0.46, 1.48]
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Al-Hayek et al., 2019
SMD 2.760 [1.430, 4.091]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw and type of OTM: Maxillary canine retraction
SMD 1.60 [0.99, 2.22]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations and jaw: <=3 in maxilla and mandible
SMD 1.14 [0.23, 2.05]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months) · Repeat of MOP: Yes
SMD 1.04 [0.44, 1.64]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: extraction space (EXT)
MD 0.33 [0.27, 0.39]
High
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to El Awady et al., 2019
SMD 2.266 [1.228, 3.304]
GRADE not reported
11 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Cumulative meta-analysis ordered by year, after adding Mordente et al., 2024
SMD 1.644 [1.183, 2.104]
GRADE not reported
31 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to last follow-up (3 weeks to 10 months)
SMD 1.66 [1.27, 2.05]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
39 studies · 1025 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Attachment lossSMD -0.36 [-1.28, 0.56]
Very low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Babanouri et al., 2020
SMD 2.173 [1.296, 3.050]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Alkebsi et al., 2018
SMD 4.364 [-4.547, 13.274]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: model-based custom references (C-Model)
MD 0.27 [0.01, 0.53]
Low
Downgraded: inconsistency
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Working wire dimension: 0.019 x 0.025
SMD 1.72 [1.18, 2.26]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Bansal et al., 2019
SMD 1.593 [1.130, 2.056]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Attri et al., 2018
SMD 2.788 [0.476, 5.101]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Study design: Split mouth
SMD 1.08 [0.55, 1.61]
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Martina et al., 2022
SMD 1.673 [1.195, 2.152]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw and type of OTM: Maxillary and mandibular alignment
SMD 2.24 [-2.14, 6.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Measured distance: canine to second premolar (C2P)
MD 0.51 [0.26, 0.76]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
7 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure
MD 0.96 [-0.08, 1.99]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
8 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw: Maxilla and mandible
SMD 1.95 [0.92, 2.98]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Alqadasi et al., 2019
SMD 2.394 [1.189, 3.599]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Female proportion: <=60%
SMD 1.77 [1.14, 2.40]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations: <=3
SMD 1.45 [0.86, 2.05]
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Allocation concealment (RoB 1): Unclear risk
SMD 1.88 [1.29, 2.47]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Sahin et al., 2023
SMD 1.586 [1.116, 2.057]
GRADE not reported
27 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Kumar et al., 2024
SMD 1.561 [1.104, 2.018]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and total perforations: <5 mm and >3
SMD 2.11 [1.18, 3.03]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Random sequence generation (RoB 1): Low risk
SMD 1.55 [1.01, 2.10]
GRADE not reported
23 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Pain change from baseline (VAS)
7 days
SMD 0.16 [-2.34, 2.66]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Sahin et al., 2023
SMD 1.672 [1.196, 2.148]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting RAGHAV et al., 2020
SMD 1.691 [1.210, 2.172]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks
SMD 1.64 [1.18, 2.10]
Moderate
Downgraded: inconsistency
31 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Thomas et al., 2021
SMD 1.574 [1.010, 2.138]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Depth and jaw: 5 mm or more in maxilla
SMD 0.27 [-0.02, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Meta-regression: mean age (years)
Meta-regression coefficient 0.170
GRADE not reported
31 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Singh et al., 2023
SMD 1.679 [1.200, 2.157]
GRADE not reported
28 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Root resorption (mm)SMD 0.02 [-0.03, 0.07]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Meta-regression: orthodontic force (g)
Meta-regression coefficient -0.037 [-0.057, -0.018]
GRADE not reported
19 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Leave-one-out: omitting Babanouri et al., 2020
SMD 1.634 [1.161, 2.107]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Risk of bias subgroup, Blinding of outcome assessment (RoB 1): High risk
SMD 7.53 [-3.07, 18.12]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Total perforations and jaw: more than 3 in maxilla and mandible
SMD 3.47 [1.68, 5.25]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Sensitivity: calculated average across jaws
SMD 2.36 [1.44, 3.29]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Total perforations: >3
SMD 1.89 [1.15, 2.64]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
Human orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs) of the alveolar cortical bone with fixed-appliance mechanicsIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics without MOPsOrthodontic tooth movement, baseline to 4 weeks
Baseline to 4 weeks · Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances · Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis: omitting Li et al., 2022
SMD 1.699 [1.227, 2.172]
GRADE not reported
30 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Jaw, total perforations and depth: <=3, <5 mm in maxilla and mandible
SMD 1.62 [1.17, 2.07]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Study design: Split mouth
MD 0.49 [0.26, 0.72]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Instrument for MOP: Miniscrew/mini-implant
SMD 1.52 [1.05, 1.99]
GRADE not reported
22 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Alikhani et al., 2013
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD 9.030 [6.109, 11.952]
GRADE not reported
1 study
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Kundi et al., 2018
SMD 4.448 [2.205, 6.691]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Rashid et al., 2018
SMD 3.787 [1.936, 5.638]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Immediate postoperative pain (VAS)
Immediately after the procedure · Instrument: Propel
MD 1.33 [-1.47, 4.12]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Bansal et al., 2019
SMD 2.472 [1.322, 3.622]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Martina et al., 2022
SMD 1.548 [1.034, 2.063]
GRADE not reported
23 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Cumulative meta-analysis up to Feizbakhsh et al., 2018
SMD 2.223 [0.631, 3.815]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Depth and instrument: <5 mm with Propel
SMD 2.00 [0.45, 3.56]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliancesMicro-osteoperforations (MOPs)No MOP (identical fixed-appliance mechanics)Orthodontic tooth movement (standardized, change from baseline)
Baseline to 4 weeks · Malocclusion: Crowding
SMD 1.71 [0.64, 2.78]
GRADE not reported
5 studies

Included primary studies 39

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Kumar 2024
Effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of en masse orthodontic tooth retraction : A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:36018346
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Singh 2023
Effect of Mini-implant assisted Micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:38234639
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Thomas 2021
Evaluation of physiodispenser assisted micro-osteoperforation on the rate of tooth movement and associated periodontal tissue status…
PMID:34112627
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Aboalnaga 2019
Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
PMID:31155698
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Alikhani 2013
Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement.
PMID:24182579
20131 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Alkebsi 2018
Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults…
PMID:29853235
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Alqadasi 2024
Three-dimensional assessment of accelerating orthodontic tooth movement-micro-osteoperforations vs piezocision: A randomized,…
PMID:33124098
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Attri 2018
Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances…
PMID:30281397
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Babanouri 2020
Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth,…
PMID:32147751
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Bansal 2019
Effects of mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforations in alleviating mandibular anterior crowding: A randomized controlled clinical…
PMID:31649899
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Fattori 2020
Micro-osteoperforation effectiveness on tooth movement rate and impact on oral health related quality of life.
PMID:33378487
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Golshah 2021
Efficacy of micro-osteoperforation of the alveolar bone by using mini-screw for acceleration of maxillary canine retraction in young adult…
PMID:34696998
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Gulduren 2020
Effects of micro-osteoperforations on intraoral miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization : A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:32095922
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Gumus 2023
Effects of miniscrew-facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A split-mouth, randomized controlled…
PMID:35024875
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Joseph 2022
Comparison of Rate of Tooth Movement, Root Resorption and Pulp Vitality during En masse Anterior Retraction with Micro-osteoperforation…
DOI:10.7860/jcdr/2022/55298.16802
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kilinc 2023
Comparison of the effectiveness of piezocision and microosteoperforation in leveling mandibular anterior teeth.
PMID:36517376
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Li 2022
The effect of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic space closure investigated over 12 weeks: a split-mouth, randomized controlled…
PMID:35134142
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mordente 2024
The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of maxillary incisors' retraction in orthodontic space closure: a randomized controlled…
PMID:38342823
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Raghav 2022
Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical…
PMID:35674571
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sahin 2023
The effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of tooth movement during the alignment stage in patients with mandibular crowding: a…
PMID:37167078
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Venkatachalapathy 2022
Effect of Frequency of Micro-osteoperforation on Miniscrew- supported Canine Retraction: A Single-centered, Split-mouth Randomized…
PMID:37283011
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Abdelhameed 2018
Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Low Energy Laser Application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the Effect of Application of Each…
PMID:30559886
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ahsan 2021
THE USE OF MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATION CONCEPT FOR ACCELERATING DIFFERENTIAL TOOTH MOVEMENT
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v71i3.3341
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Attar 2022
Effect of mini-implant facilitated micro-osteoperforations on the alignment of mandibular anterior crowding: A randomised controlled…
PMID:35575069
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Hayek 2019
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF MICROOSTEOPERFORATIONS ON THE RATE OF TOOTH MOVEMENT DURING ALLEVIATION OF MANDIBULAR ANTERIOR CROWDING
DOI:10.21608/asdj.2019.164531
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alfailany 2023
Effectiveness of Flapless Cortico-Alveolar Perforations Using Mechanical Drills Versus Traditional Corticotomy on the Retraction of…
PMID:37641723
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alqadasi 2019
The Effectiveness of Micro-osteoperforations during Canine Retraction: A Three-dimensional Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:32039085
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bavikati 2022
Effect of micro osteo-perforations (MOP) on the rate of tooth movement and levels of interleukin- 1β - a split mouth study.
PMID:35720241
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El Awady 2019
EFFICACY OF MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATIONS ON THE RATE OF MAXILLARY CANINE RETRACTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
DOI:10.21608/asdj.2019.164500
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Farag 2021
Evaluation of the Effect of Micro-osteoperforations versus Piezopuncture on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Associated with Canine…
DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2021.6173
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Feizbakhsh 2018
The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement
DOI:10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.04.002
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gowda 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hashem 2024
Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Repeated Micro-Osteoperforations During Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:38344550
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kundi 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mahmoudi 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martina 2022
DOI:10.21307/aoj-2022-0038
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ozkan 2021
The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, single-blind, randomized…
PMID:33984223
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rasheed 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rashid 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman orthodontic patients; patients with systemic bone-metabolism disorders excludedOrthodontic patients, mostly aged 16 to 28 years, 39 trials (n=1025)
InterventionAny MOP protocol regardless of instrument, perforation depth, number, site or repetition; trials with additional acceleration methods excludedMOPs, mostly with miniscrews (Propel in a minority), 2 to 21 perforations per session, depth 1 to 8 mm, 29 trials single session and 10 repeated (n=39 trials)
ComparisonIdentical fixed-appliance mechanics delivered without MOPsNo MOP (control side or control group) with the same fixed-appliance mechanics (n=39 trials)
OutcomesPrimary: orthodontic tooth movement (baseline to 4 weeks; baseline to last follow-up). Secondary: pain (VAS immediately after the procedure, change at 24 h and 7 days), root resorption, gingival index, probing pocket depth, anchorage loss; any outcome in 3 or more trials was pooledTooth movement SMD at 4 weeks (k=31) and at last follow-up (k=39); MD by measurement method (LII k=5, extraction space k=3, C2P k=7, CL k=6, model-based k=8, C-TAD k=2); root resorption (k=6); attachment loss (k=6); gingival index (k=4); pocket depth (k=3); pain immediate (k=8), 24 h (k=7), 7 days (k=4)
Study designsParallel-arm or split-mouth randomized controlled trials39 randomized controlled trials (about half split-mouth, remainder parallel-arm), 2013 to 2024
TimingBaseline to 4 weeks; baseline to each study's last follow-upFollow-up from 3 to 4 weeks up to 12 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalYesYesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes