Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42031860

Effectiveness of intracanal cryotherapy in reducing post-endodontic pain in irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohamed Maged, Abdelmajeed Asmaa, Salah-Uddin Anwar Laithy Muhammad, et al. · Scientific reports · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47860-5

Findings

Population Patients undergoing root canal treatment (irreversible pulpitis)

8 findings

Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
6 h · Clinical endodontic treatment · Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) excluding Abuhelal et al.
SMD -0.4 [-0.72, -0.07]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 174 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
72 h · Clinical endodontic treatment
SMD 0.01 [-0.26, 0.28]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 214 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
6 h · Clinical endodontic treatment
SMD -0.88 [-1.83, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 198 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
24 h · Clinical endodontic treatment
SMD -0.09 [-0.33, 0.16]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 412 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
12 h · Clinical endodontic treatment
SMD -0.57 [-1.12, -0.02]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 128 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
24 h · Clinical endodontic treatment · Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) excluding Alharthi et al.
SMD -0.18 [-0.39, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 366 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
48 h · Clinical endodontic treatment
SMD -0.01 [-0.21, 0.19]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 368 participants
Intracanal cryotherapy (cold irrigant)Conventional irrigation (room-temperature irrigant)Postoperative pain intensity (VAS/NRS)
12 h · Clinical endodontic treatment · Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out) excluding Iparraguirre Nuñovero et al.
SMD -0.85 [-1.35, -0.35]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 68 participants

Included primary studies 11

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Mokhtari 2023
The effect of different concentrations and temperatures of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on pain intensity following endodontic treatment…
PMID:37345724
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Alharthi 2019
Effect of intra-canal cryotherapy on post-endodontic pain in single-visit RCT: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:31337936
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Karatas 2021
Effect of final irrigation with sodium hypochlorite at different temperatures on postoperative pain level and antibacterial activity: a…
PMID:33624688
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Keskin 2023
Effect of intracanal cryotherapy on the inflammatory cytokine, proteolytic enzyme levels and post-operative pain in teeth with…
PMID:37222468
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Vieyra 2019
Reduction of postendodontic pain after one-visit root canal treatment using three irrigating regimens with different temperature.
PMID:30666017
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Abuhelal 2025
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF CRYOTHERAPY VERSUS POST-OPERATIVE IBUPROFEN MEDICATION ON POST-OPERATIVE PAIN IN MANDIBULAR MOLAR TEETH WITH…
DOI:10.21608/adjc.2024.278506.1508
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Nahlawi 2016
Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy and Negative Irrigation Technique on Postendodontic Pain.
PMID:27965485
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ingale 2024
Efficacy of Endodontic Cryotherapy in Alleviating Post-Treatment Pain after Single-Visit RCT: A Randomized Study.
PMID:39927052
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Iparraguirre Nunovero 2024
The effect of intracanal cryotherapy with and without foraminal enlargement on pain prevention after endodontic treatment: a randomized…
PMID:39191915
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Junaid 2023
Frequency of pain in Teeth with irreversible pulpitis after single visit root canal treatment using cryotherapy
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v72i6.4295
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mitra 2024
Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy and Curcuma Longa as a Final Irrigant in Reducing Post Operative Pain: An In-Vivo Study.
PMID:39346349
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman patients undergoing endodontic treatment (irreversible pulpitis)Patients undergoing root canal treatment: irreversible pulpitis, vital teeth, asymptomatic apical periodontitis (11 RCTs; 8 meta-analyzed)
InterventionIntracanal cryotherapy (cold saline or cold irrigant delivered intracanal)Intracanal cryotherapy with cold saline, EDTA, distilled water or NaOCl (about 2 to 4 C)
ComparisonConventional endodontic treatment (conventional irrigation or no cryotherapy)Room-temperature or warm irrigation, no additional irrigation, ibuprofen
OutcomesPost-endodontic pain (VAS/NRS) at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h; secondary: later time points and analgesic consumptionPostoperative pain SMD at 6 h (4 studies), 12 h (3), 24 h (7), 48 h (6), 72 h (3)
Study designsRCTs11 RCTs
Timing6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h3 h to 7 days; pooled at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 h

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalYesPartial Yesno
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedNoYesno
OverallLowLowyes