Non-Cochrane · DTA · PM41899572

Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Salivary Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Wijaya Arbi, Julia Vera, Soedarsono Nurtami, et al. · Cancers · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/cancers18060970

Findings

33 findings

Population
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
All studies (before omission of outliers)
Log OR 1.57 [1.2, 1.94]
GRADE not reported
45 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Positive likelihood ratioLR+ 2
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Detection platform: qRT-PCR
Log OR 1.64 [1.2, 2.09]
GRADE not reported
28 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Geographic region: group 2 (unlabeled)
Log OR 1.83 [0.94, 2.73]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a positive result
Pre-test probability 10% · Symptomatic/suspicion lesion clinic · Pre-test probability 10% (Symptomatic/suspicion lesion clinic)
Post-test probability (%) 21
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Area under the SROC curveAUC 0.75 [0.71, 0.79]
GRADE not reported
18 studies · 1628 participants
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Geographic region: group 3 (unlabeled)
Log OR 2.85 [-1.01, 6.7]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a negative result
Pre-test probability 0.01% · General population screening · Pre-test probability 0.01% (General population screening)
Post-test probability (%) 0
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Leave-one-out sensitivity: after omission of 9 outlier datasets
Log OR 1.52 [1.23, 1.8]
GRADE not reported
36 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a positive result
Pre-test probability 0.01% · General population screening · Pre-test probability 0.01% (General population screening)
Post-test probability (%) 0
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Study quality (QUADAS-2): some concerns
Log OR -0.38 [-1.76, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic odds ratio
Random-effects meta-analysis of 45 datasets
DOR 4.53 [3.18, 6.47]
GRADE not reported
18 studies · 1628 participants
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Geographic region: group 1 (unlabeled)
Log OR 1.48 [1.09, 1.87]
GRADE not reported
33 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Pooled specificitySpecificity 0.71 [0.66, 0.76]
GRADE not reported
18 studies · 1628 participants
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Biomarker type: protein based
Log OR 1.59 [0.93, 2.25]
GRADE not reported
16 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Detection platform: others
Log OR 1.24 [0.63, 1.86]
GRADE not reported
14 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Geographic region: group 4 (unlabeled)
Log OR 2.5 [-5.87, 10.87]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Study quality (QUADAS-2): high risk
Log OR 1.71 [1.38, 2.05]
GRADE not reported
42 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Detection platform: ELISA
Log OR 4.59 [0.44, 8.74]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV miRNAs)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Threshold effect: correlation of sensitivity and specificityCorrelation coefficient 0.28
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Biomarker type: nucleic acid based
Log OR 1.57 [1.12, 2.03]
GRADE not reported
29 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a positive result
Pre-test probability 0.5% · Low-risk/opportunistic screening · Pre-test probability 0.5% (Low-risk/opportunistic screening)
Post-test probability (%) 1
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a negative result
Pre-test probability 10% · Symptomatic/suspicion lesion clinic · Pre-test probability 10% (Symptomatic/suspicion lesion clinic)
Post-test probability (%) 5
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a positive result
Pre-test probability 40% · High-suspicion/referral setting · Pre-test probability 40% (High-suspicion/referral setting)
Post-test probability (%) 62
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a negative result
Pre-test probability 0.5% · Low-risk/opportunistic screening · Pre-test probability 0.5% (Low-risk/opportunistic screening)
Post-test probability (%) 0
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic odds ratio
Bivariate model (Figure 4 footer)
DOR 4.6 [3.1, 6.83]
GRADE not reported
18 studies · 1628 participants
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Pooled sensitivitySensitivity 0.64 [0.59, 0.69]
GRADE not reported
18 studies · 1628 participants
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Post-test probability of OSCC after a negative result
Pre-test probability 40% · High-suspicion/referral setting · Pre-test probability 40% (High-suspicion/referral setting)
Post-test probability (%) 24
GRADE not reported
18 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Pooled sensitivity
QUADAS-2 high risk of bias (univariable meta-regression)
Sensitivity 0.82 [0.66, 0.92]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Biomarker composition: single biomarker
Log OR 1.56 [1.18, 1.94]
GRADE not reported
41 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Diagnostic log odds ratio
Biomarker composition: panel biomarker
Log OR 1.67 [-0.0, 3.33]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Pooled specificity
QUADAS-2 high risk of bias (univariable meta-regression)
Specificity 0.91 [0.8, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) versus healthy controlsSalivary biomarkers (proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, miRNAs, circRNAs, EV-miRNAs; single or panel)Histopathological confirmation (reference standard)Negative likelihood ratioLR- 0.47
GRADE not reported
18 studies

Included primary studies 34

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Balakittnen 2024
A novel saliva-based miRNA profile to diagnose and predict oral cancer
DOI:10.1038/s41368-023-00273-w
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Balakittnen 2024
A novel saliva-based miRNA profile to diagnose and predict oral cancer.
PMID:38368395
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Garg 2023
Evaluation of Diagnostic Significance of Salivary miRNA-184 and miRNA-21 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Oral Potentially Malignant…
PMID:38015343
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Ghallab 2016
Serum and salivary levels of chemerin and MMP-9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral premalignant lesions.
PMID:27161218
20172 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Romani 2021
Genome-wide study of salivary miRNAs identifies miR-423-5p as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:33456584
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Tarrad 2023
"Salivary LINC00657 and miRNA-106a as diagnostic biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma, an observational diagnostic study".
PMID:38087258
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Duz 2016
Identification of miR-139-5p as a saliva biomarker for tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
PMID:26650483
20161 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Garg 2023
Evaluation of Diagnostic Significance of Salivary miRNA-184 and miRNA-21 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Oral Potentially Malignant…
DOI:10.1007/s12105-023-01600-7
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
He 2020
Salivary exosomal miR-24-3p serves as a potential detective biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma screening.
PMID:31704611
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2018
Evaluation of saliva and plasma cytokine biomarkers in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:29174861
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mehterov 2022
A novel panel of clinically relevant miRNAs signature accurately differentiates oral cancer from normal mucosa.
PMID:36531016
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Scholtz 2022
Salivary miR-31-5p, miR-345-3p, and miR-424-3p Are Reliable Biomarkers in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
PMID:35215172
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Tarrad 2023
“Salivary LINC00657 and miRNA-106a as diagnostic biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma, an observational diagnostic study”
DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-03726-0
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Wan 2017
Salivary miRNA panel to detect HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancer patients.
PMID:29245955
20171 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Anu 2021
Identification of potential salivary biomarker panels for oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-82635-0
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Anu 2021
Identification of potential salivary biomarker panels for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:33564003
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Awasthi 2017
Role of salivary biomarkers in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_140_16
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Awasthi 2017
Role of salivary biomarkers in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:29323056
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chu 2024
Clinical validation of a saliva-based matrix metalloproteinase-1 rapid strip test for detection of oral cavity cancer
DOI:10.1016/j.bj.2023.04.002
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chu 2024
Clinical validation of a saliva-based matrix metalloproteinase-1 rapid strip test for detection of oral cavity cancer.
PMID:37044249
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Duz 2016
Identification of miR-139-5p as a saliva biomarker for tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study
DOI:10.1007/s13402-015-0259-z
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gai 2018
Salivary extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs as potential biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1186/s12885-018-4364-z
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gai 2018
Salivary extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs as potential biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:29669525
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ghallab 2016
Serum and salivary levels of chemerin and MMP-9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral premalignant lesions
DOI:10.1007/s00784-016-1846-8
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
He 2020
Salivary exosomal miR-24-3p serves as a potential detective biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma screening
DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109553
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kumar 2025
Evaluation of salivary and serum Exosomal mRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-22246-1
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kumar 2025
Evaluation of salivary and serum Exosomal mRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
PMID:41184439
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2018
Evaluation of saliva and plasma cytokine biomarkers in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.016
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mehterov 2022
A novel panel of clinically relevant miRNAs signature accurately differentiates oral cancer from normal mucosa
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1072579
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rapado-Gonzalez 2022
Integrity and quantity of salivary cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> as a potential molecular biomarker in oral cancer: A preliminary study
DOI:10.1111/jop.13299
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rapado-Gonzalez 2022
Integrity and quantity of salivary cell-free DNA as a potential molecular biomarker in oral cancer: A preliminary study.
PMID:35416334
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wan 2017
Salivary miRNA panel to detect HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancer patients
DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.21725
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhao 2018
Salivary Circular RNAs Hsa_Circ_0001874 and Hsa_Circ_0001971 as Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
DOI:10.1159/000491624
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhao 2018
Salivary Circular RNAs Hsa_Circ_0001874 and Hsa_Circ_0001971 as Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
PMID:29991057
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with OSCC and healthy control cohorts screened to exclude oral inflammatory pathologiesPatients with OSCC and healthy controls (1628 participants; 18 studies; 45 datasets)
InterventionSalivary biomarkers (proteomic, genomic, transcriptomic) validated by standardized molecular or immunoassay techniquesSalivary proteins, cytokines, cfDNA, single and panel miRNAs, circRNAs, EV miRNAs (n=45 datasets)
ComparisonHistopathological confirmation as reference standardHistopathology
OutcomesSensitivity, specificity, DOR, AUC, likelihood ratios (2x2 data required)Pooled sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.71, DOR 4.53, AUC 0.75, LR+ 2, LR- 0.47
Study designsDiagnostic accuracy studies: case-control, cross-sectional, cohortCase-control (majority), cross-sectional, prospective cohort (n=18)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified