Non-Cochrane · prognostic · PM38233799

Gene sequencing applications to combat oral-cavity related disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Abdul Nishath Sayed, Shenoy Mahesh, Reddy Naveen Rami, et al. · BMC oral health · 2024 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03541-7

Oral HealthDental cariesAMSTAR 2: not applicable
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
3
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
8
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman subjects of any age, gender, ethnicity, and geographical location with oral-cavity related disorders (dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis, oral cancer, among others)Patients with various oral-cavity disorders (dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis, oral cancer, cleft lip, peri-implant mucositis) across 9 included studies (n=9 studies; 8 clinical trials meta-analyzed, 2211 participants)
InterventionGene sequencing techniques: next-generation sequencing (NGS), single-molecule sequencing, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing; RNA-seq (mRNA, small RNA, non-coding RNA)Gene sequencing, predominantly 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing of the oral microbiome; one genome-wide association study (cleft lip) (n=9 studies)
ComparisonNot specified (no comparator defined in the eligibility criteria)No distinct comparator arm; forest plots contrast 'noticeable impact' vs 'abysmal effect' events within the same samples
OutcomesImpact of gene sequencing on diagnosing and/or treating oral-cavity disorders; gene-expression profiles related to oral diseasesNoticeable impact of gene sequencing on diagnosing/managing oral conditions, pooled as OR, RR and RD (n=8 studies meta-analyzed)
Study designsNot specified (peer-reviewed studies; synthesis later restricted to clinical trials)9 studies: 6 randomized controlled trials, 2 observational trials, and 1 literature review (8 clinical trials entered the meta-analysis)
TimingNot specifiedVaries by study (e.g. baseline to 1-3 months in microbiome studies); not uniformly reported

Search date: Not reported (search restricted to studies published 2015 to 2022; exact search-run date not given). Databases: PubMed; Scopus; Embase; Web of Science; Google Scholar

Questions and results

Gene sequencing (GS) applied to diagnose/manage oral conditions (predominantly 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing of the oral microbiome; also genome-wide/whole-genome sequencing) vs Negligible ('abysmal') effect of gene sequencing; no separate comparator arm (within-sample event contrast in the forest plots)

Population: Human patients (any age) with oral-cavity related disorders (e.g. dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis, peri-implant mucositis, oral/head-and-neck cancer, cleft lip)
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Noticeable impact of gene sequencing on diagnosing/managing oral conditions
Overall
Pooled across 8 clinical trials, gene sequencing had a statistically significant impact on diagnosing/managing oral-cavity disorders (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.54); certainty not GRADE-rated.
Source: Fig. 4 (risk-ratio forest plot); Results (forest-plot description) · same question in other reviews
RR 0.50 [0.46, 0.54]8 studies · 2211 participantsUngraded
Noticeable impact of gene sequencing on diagnosing/managing oral conditions
Overall
Pooled across 8 clinical trials, gene sequencing had a statistically significant impact on diagnosing/managing oral-cavity disorders (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.26-0.33); certainty not GRADE-rated.
Source: Fig. 3 (odds-ratio forest plot); Results (Statistical analysis; forest-plot description) · same question in other reviews
OR 0.30 [0.26, 0.33]8 studies · 2211 participantsUngraded
Reduction in occurrence of oral conditions
Overall
Pooled across 8 clinical trials, gene sequencing was associated with a statistically significant risk difference for impact on oral-cavity disorders (RD -0.29, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.26); certainty not GRADE-rated.
Source: Results (text description of Fig. 5, risk-difference forest plot) · same question in other reviews
RD -0.29 [-0.32, -0.26]8 studies · 2211 participantsUngraded

Included primary studies 8

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
Benic et al. 2019
Oral probiotics reduce halitosis in patients wearing orthodontic braces: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:31022704
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
De Oliveira et al. 2021
Impact of systemic probiotics as adjuncts to subgingival instrumentation on the oral-gut microbiota associated with periodontitis: A…
PMID:34028826
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Divaris et al. 2019
The Era of the Genome and Dental Medicine.
PMID:31329043
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ihara et al. 2019
Identification of Initial Colonizing Bacteria in Dental Plaques from Young Adults Using Full-Length 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
PMID:31481603
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Kao et al. 2022
Afatinib and Pembrolizumab for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ALPHA Study): A Phase II Study with…
PMID:35046059
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Philip et al. 2022
The microbiome of dental and peri-implant subgingival plaque during peri-implant mucositis therapy: A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:34664294
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Van et al. 2019
Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate: Genome-Wide Association Study in Europeans Identifies a Suggestive Risk Locus at…
PMID:31817908
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Zaura et al. 2015
Same Exposure but Two Radically Different Responses to Antibiotics: Resilience of the Salivary Microbiome versus Long-Term Microbial…
PMID:26556275
this review onlyReduction in occurrence of oral conditionsnot extracted yetnot extracted yet