Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM36231240

Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Oral Health among Children Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lam Phoebe Pui Ying, Zhou Ni, Yiu Cynthia Kar Yung, et al. · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/ijerph191911943

Oral HealthDental cariesAMSTAR 2: Critically Low / Low (extractors disagree)
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
33
current version
GRADE rated
28
No studies
3
Included studies
14
linked below
No studies 3 · 9.1%Ungraded 2 · 6.1%Very low 28 · 84.8%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)CLWH aged 3 months to 17 years (n=3525)
InterventionAntiretroviral therapy (ART); combined ART (cART) for medication-type comparisonsART / cART / post-cART / various regimens (n=793 on different ART; 2438 in within-person cohorts)
ComparisonTreatment-naive CLWH; for medication-type comparisons, conventional monotherapy or dual therapyNo medication (treatment-naive, n=294); pre-cART; monotherapy or dual therapy
Outcomes(a) Dental caries; (b) oral hygiene and periodontal health; (c) HIV-related orofacial diseases (WHO clinical staging); (d) salivary immunoglobulin quantity; (e) oral microbiome count; (f) dental development and maturationCaries; periodontal disease; oral hygiene; oral candidiasis; other HIV-related orofacial diseases; salivary IgA; dental development
Study designsCase-control observational studies and randomised controlled studies with English full text; cross-sectional and uncontrolled interventional studies excluded14 observational studies (3 cohort/within-person, 11 parallel-group case-control); no RCTs
TimingNot specifiedNot specified (ART duration examined as a modifier; >=3 years associated with lower candidiasis)

Search date: 2022-08-03 (inception to 3 August 2022). Databases: Ovid Embase; Ovid MEDLINE; PubMed; Scopus (plus reference-list hand-search)

Questions and results

Antiretroviral therapy (any, including cART) vs No antiretroviral medication (treatment-naive)

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
17 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Salivary immunoglobulin A (SIgA) concentration
Evidence on salivary IgA in CLWH on versus off ART was divergent and inconclusive (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.7 (Saliva Immunoglobulins Quantity) · same question in other reviews
Two studies gave divergent results: Subramaniam (2015) reported higher SIgA in children on ART for more than 3 years than pre-ART (8.6 (SD 2.9) vs 6.2 (SD 1.7) mg/dL; p < 0.001), whereas Pomarico (2009) found lower…2 studiesVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis prevalence
Acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis was significantly more prevalent in treatment-naive CLWH than in those on ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.00 [0.00, 0.02]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Parotid hypertrophy prevalence
Parotid hypertrophy was significantly more prevalent in treatment-naive CLWH than in those on ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.01 [0.00, 0.05]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Angular cheilitis prevalence
No significant difference in angular cheilitis between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.58 [0.17, 1.99]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Ulcerative stomatitis prevalence
Ulcerative stomatitis was significantly more prevalent in treatment-naive CLWH than in those on ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.03 [0.02, 0.07]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Linear gingival erythema prevalence
No significant difference in linear gingival erythema between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 1.29 [0.58, 2.88]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Oral candidiasis prevalence
Population: Children and adolescents living with HIV
ART was associated with lower oral candidiasis prevalence.
Source: Results 3.5 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.35 [0.19, 0.63]7 studiesVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Dental development and maturation
A single small study suggested delayed dental development in CLWH on ART, but the evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.8 (Dental Development and Maturation) · same question in other reviews
One study (Trigueiro 2010) reported that dental age exceeded chronological age by 5.35 to 14.36 months (SE 3.03 to 15.86) in children on NRTI/PI/NNRTI regimens versus -0.67 months in those without medication; the…1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Oral hygiene status
Oral hygiene status did not differ significantly between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.4 (Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Status); Figure 3; Supplementary Table S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.73 [0.13, 4.26]0 studiesUngraded
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Mucocele prevalence
No significant difference in mucocele between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.02 [0.00, 1.09]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Kaposi's sarcoma prevalence
Kaposi's sarcoma was significantly more prevalent in treatment-naive CLWH than in those on ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.00 [0.00, 0.03]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Recurrent oral ulceration prevalence
No significant difference in recurrent oral ulceration between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 1.50 [0.72, 3.13]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Oral hairy leukoplakia prevalence
No significant difference in oral hairy leukoplakia between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 2.75 [0.39, 19.43]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Periodontal disease prevalence
ART was not associated with a significant difference in periodontal disease prevalence among CLWH (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.4 (Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Status); Figure 3; Supplementary Table S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.82 [0.46, 1.44]2 studies · 250 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Mucosal hyperpigmentation prevalence
No significant difference in mucosal hyperpigmentation between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 1.79 [0.89, 3.61]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Chronic herpes simplex infection prevalence
No significant difference in chronic herpes simplex infection between CLWH with and without ART (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.6 (Other HIV-Related Orofacial Diseases); Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 2.47 [0.88, 6.97]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Dental caries experience
ART was not associated with a significant difference in dental caries experience among CLWH (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.4 (CLWH under ART versus those without Dental Caries Experience); Supplementary Table S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.91 [0.5, 1.65]2 studies · 301 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs No antiretroviral medication (treatment-naive)

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral candidiasis prevalence
cART
cART was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of oral candidiasis in CLWH (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.5 (Oral Candidiasis and Oral Microbiome Count); Figure 4; Supplementary Table S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.35 [0.24, 0.51]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Combined antiretroviral therapy (post-cART) vs Pre-cART (same children, before therapy)

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral candidiasis prevalence
After vs before cART (within-person) · post-cART vs pre-cART
Oral candidiasis prevalence fell significantly after cART compared with before cART in the same children (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.5 (Oral Candidiasis and Oral Microbiome Count); Figure 4; Supplementary Table S1 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.19 [0.15, 0.25]NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy vs No antiretroviral medication (treatment-naive)

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral candidiasis prevalence
monotherapy or dual therapy
Oral candidiasis prevalence did not differ significantly between treatment-naive CLWH and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.5 (Oral Candidiasis and Oral Microbiome Count) · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in oral candidiasis prevalence was found between treatment-naive CLWH and those under monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text).NRVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency

Combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs Monotherapy or dual antiretroviral therapy

Population: Children and adolescents (<18 years) living with HIV (CLWH)
12 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Recurrent oral ulceration prevalence
No significant difference in recurrent oral ulceration between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in recurrent oral ulceration between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Kaposi's sarcoma prevalence
No significant difference in kaposi's sarcoma between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in kaposi's sarcoma between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Angular cheilitis prevalence
No eligible studies compared angular cheilitis between different ART regimens.
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No eligible studies compared angular cheilitis between CLWH on different ART medications.0 studiesNo studies
Dental caries prevalence and severity
No significant difference in dental caries/severity between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in dental caries/severity between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 2 study(ies).2 studiesVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Dental development and maturation
No eligible studies compared dental development and maturation between different ART regimens.
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No eligible studies compared dental development and maturation between CLWH on different ART medications.0 studiesNo studies
Chronic herpes simplex infection prevalence
No significant difference in chronic herpes simplex infection between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in chronic herpes simplex infection between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Linear gingival erythema prevalence
No significant difference in linear gingival erythema between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in linear gingival erythema between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Acute necrotising ulcerative periodontitis prevalence
No significant difference in acute necrotising ulcerative periodontitis between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in acute necrotising ulcerative periodontitis between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Oral hairy leukoplakia prevalence
No eligible studies compared oral hairy leukoplakia between different ART regimens.
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No eligible studies compared oral hairy leukoplakia between CLWH on different ART medications.0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis prevalence
No significant difference in gingivitis between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in gingivitis between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 2 study(ies).2 studiesVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Oral candidiasis prevalence
cART was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of oral candidiasis than monotherapy or dual therapy (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Figure 5; Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
OR 0.22 [0.16, 0.29]4 studiesVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Persistent parotid enlargement prevalence
No significant difference in persistent parotid enlargement between ART regimens (very low certainty).
Source: Results 3.9 (CLWH under Different ART Medications); Supplementary Table S2 · same question in other reviews
No significant difference in persistent parotid enlargement between CLWH on cART and those on monotherapy or dual therapy (no numeric estimate reported in the text); 1 study(ies).1 studyVery low
Downgraded: imprecision

Comparison

1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral Candida carriage and salivary yeast concentration
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded

AMSTAR 2 appraisal

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: N/A · NRSI: YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoN/Ano
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno

Included primary studies 14

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
Birungi 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Baghirath 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Divakar 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Flanagan 2000
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Jose 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Konstantyner 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Melo 2009
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Mensana 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Oliscovicz 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Pomarico 2009
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ponnam 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Prasitsuebsai 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Subramaniam 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Trigueiro 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match).