Cochrane · intervention · CD004625

Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults

Lamont, T, Worthington, HV, Clarkson, JE, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthPeriodontology5 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
25
current version
GRADE rated
14
No studies
11
Included studies
2
as reported
No studies 11 · 44%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 12%Low 3 · 12%Moderate 0 · 0%High 8 · 32%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationWe included studies involving dentate adults regularly attending for dental care in primary care settings. We excluded trials where participants were described as having severe periodontal disease (e.g. alveolar bone loss involving most teeth, or people requiring referral for specialist (surgical) periodontal treatment). We also excluded trials where participants had previously undergone specialist periodontal treatment and were in the post-treatment 'maintenance phase'.The two included studies were conducted in general dental practice settings in the UK and involved regularly attending adults without severe periodontitis. Ramsay 2018 included 1406 participants and Jones 2011 included 305 participants in the analyses, giving a total of 1711 participants in this review. Participants were adults aged 18 to 92 years in Ramsay 2018 and aged 18 to 73 years in Jones 2011.
InterventionWe included trials where routine S&P treatments with or without oral hygiene instruction were provided by a dentist, dental hygienist or therapist.Scale and polish at 6-monthly intervals (n=2); Scale and polish at 12-monthly intervals (n=2)
ComparisonS&P treatment at a planned, regular interval (e.g. every six months, every 12 months) versus no scheduled S&P treatment for the duration of the trial/S&P treatment at a planned, regular interval (e.g. every six months) versus S&P treatment at a different planned, regular interval (e.g. every 12 months)/S&P treatment provided by a dentist at a planned, regular interval (e.g. every six months) versus S&P treatment provided by a dental hygienist or dental therapist at the same planned, regular intervalNo scale and polish (n=2)
OutcomesPeriodontal disease, assessed by gingivitis indices (both inflammatory and bleeding on probing). Secondary outcomes: Calculus and plaque indices; Changes in probing depths; Changes in attachment level; Periodontal indices; Tooth loss; Adverse events; Halitosis; Participant satisfaction; Oral-health related quality of life; Costs of S&P.Gingivitis indices (n=2); Calculus indices (n=2); Plaque indices (n=1); Probing depth (n=1); Quality of life (n=1); Participant satisfaction outcomes (n=1); Cost (n=1)
Study designsWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least six months' follow-up. We excluded split-mouth studies as this design does not reflect the manner in which a routine S&P is delivered in practice.NR
TimingAt least six months' follow-upOne study measured outcomes at 24 months and one study measured outcomes at 36 months

Search date: 2018-01-10. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid

Questions and results

Current version only

Planned, regular routine scale and polish (6-monthly; 12-monthly parallel) vs No scheduled scale and polish treatment

Population: Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental practice)
CD004625.PUB5 (current) · 11 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
36 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
RR 1.83 [1.28, 2.63]
30 per 100 vs 52 per 100
1 study · 205 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Gingivitis
24 to 36 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
SMD -0.01 [-0.13, 0.11]2 studies · 1087 participantsHigh
Halitosis
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Probing depth
36 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD 0.00 [-0.04, 0.04]1 study · 880 participantsHigh
Costs (NHS perspective, GBP)
6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD 0.52 [-18.10, 19.14]1 study · 554 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Plaque
24 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD -0.04 [-0.13, 0.05]1 study · 207 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Attachment change
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Calculus
24 to 36 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
SMD -0.32 [-0.44, -0.20]2 studies · 1086 participantsHigh
Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14)
36 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD -0.30 [-1.24, 0.64]1 study · 795 participantsHigh
Tooth loss
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental practice)
CD004625.PUB5 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14)
36 months
MD -0.40 [-1.34, 0.54]1 study · 786 participantsHigh
Costs (NHS perspective, GBP)
MD -7.62 [-28.39, 13.15]1 study · 556 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision, indirectness
Plaque
24 months
MD -0.04 [-0.13, 0.05]1 study · 207 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Calculus
24 to 36 months
SMD -0.13 [-0.25, -0.01]2 studies · 1086 participantsHigh
Probing depth
36 months
MD 0.00 [-0.04, 0.04]1 study · 882 participantsHigh
Gingivitis
24 to 36 months
SMD 0.03 [-0.09, 0.15]2 studies · 1090 participantsHigh
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
36 months
RR 1.11 [0.85, 1.47]
47 per 100 vs 52 per 100
1 study · 207 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)

Population: Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental practice)
CD004625.PUB5 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Calculus
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral health-related quality of life
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Probing depth
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Participant satisfaction
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Costs (NHS perspective)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish (6-monthly or 12-monthly) vs No treatment (no scale and polish)

Population: Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis
CD004625.PUB4 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
24 months
OR 0.36 [0.20, 0.65]
29 per 100 (no S&P) vs 52 per 100 (6-monthly)
1 study · 207 participantsUngraded
Attachment change
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Tooth loss
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis
24 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD -0.02 [-0.10, 0.06]1 study · 207 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Plaque
24 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD -0.04 [-0.13, 0.05]1 study · 207 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Calculus
24 months · 6-monthly (12-monthly parallel)
MD -0.24 [-0.51, 0.03]1 study · 207 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval vs Scale and polish only in response to signs/symptoms of periodontal disease (variable interval by bacterial/DDFM test)

Population: Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis
CD004625.PUB4 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Probing depth
24 months
MD -0.05 [-0.14, 0.04]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Gingivitis
24 months
MD 0.05 [-0.08, 0.18]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Plaque
24 months
MD -0.10 [-0.22, 0.02]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis
CD004625.PUB4 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
24 months · 6 vs 12 months, with OHI
SMD -0.25 [-0.44, -0.06]2 studies · 438 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Plaque
24 months · 6 vs 12 months, with OHI
SMD -0.16 [-0.35, 0.03]2 studies · 438 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Gingivitis
24 months · 6 vs 12 months, with OHI
SMD -0.08 [-0.27, 0.10]2 studies · 438 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
24 months
OR 0.95 [0.53, 1.70]1 study · 207 participantsUngraded

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)

Population: Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis
CD004625.PUB4 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Plaque
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Gingivitis
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish with oral hygiene instruction (OHI) vs Routine scale and polish without OHI (same interval)

Population: Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis
CD004625.PUB4 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
24 months · 3-monthly interval
MD -0.02 [-0.16, 0.12]1 study · 131 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Plaque
24 months · 3-monthly interval
MD -0.17 [-0.31, -0.03]1 study · 131 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Gingivitis
24 months · 3-monthly interval
MD -0.07 [-0.18, 0.04]1 study · 131 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Routine scale and polish vs No scale and polish (no treatment)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
11 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Calculus
22 months · with OHI subgroup
MD 0.77 [0.63, 0.91]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
3 to 11 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
6 to 22 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded

Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval vs Scale and polish only in response to signs/symptoms of periodontal disease (variable interval by bacterial/DDFM test)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Probing depth
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Plaque
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Recurrent periodontitis
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Attachment level
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (Lightner 1971 with OHI; Suomi 1973 no OHI).2 studiesUngraded
Attachment change
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant difference in attachment change between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant difference in pocket depth between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Calculus
24 to 48 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in 6-month vs 12-month group in Lightner 1971 (with OHI) at 24 months (not significant at 36, 48 months) and in Suomi 1973 (no OHI) at 36 months.2 studiesUngraded
Plaque
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in plaque between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals: Lightner 1971 (with OHI) at 24, 36 and 48 months; Suomi 1973 (no OHI) at 36 months.2 studiesUngraded

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish with oral hygiene instruction (OHI) vs Routine scale and polish without OHI (same interval)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Plaque
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pocket depth
12 to 24 months
MD -1.50 [-2.04, -0.96]1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
12 to 24 months
Attachment loss statistically significantly greater in the 6-month group than the 2-week group at 12 and 24 months; a gain in attachment was reported in the 2-week group (Nyman 1975).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
12 to 24 months
MD -1.60 [-1.81, -1.39]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
12 to 24 months
MD -1.40 [-1.68, -1.12]1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
24 months
Attachment loss statistically significantly greater in the 12-month group than the 2-week group at 24 months; a gain in attachment was reported in the 2-week group (Rosling 1976).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
24 months
MD -1.40 [-1.80, -1.00]1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
24 months
MD -1.20 [-1.91, -0.49]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
24 months
MD -1.10 [-1.50, -0.70]1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 3 months (with OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months (with OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in calculus between 3- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (with OHI) at 12, 24, 36 or 48 months (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between the 3- and 6-month scale and polish (with OHI) interval groups at any time point (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded
Plaque
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in plaque between 3- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (with OHI) at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 4 months (no OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months (no OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
36 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between the 4- and 6-month scale and polish (no OHI) interval groups at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Calculus
36 months
No statistically significant differences in calculus between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Plaque
36 months
No statistically significant difference in plaque between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
36 months
No statistically significant differences in pocket depth between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
36 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment change between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 3 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
24 to 48 months
Plaque statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 36 months (not significant at 24, 48 months); without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Calculus
24 to 48 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 24 and 48 months (not significant at 36 months); without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
24 to 48 months
Gingivitis statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months; without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 4 months (no OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months (no OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
36 months
No statistically significant difference in gingivitis between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
36 months
No statistically significant differences in pocket depth between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Calculus
36 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in the 4-month vs 12-month group (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973); favours 4-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Plaque
36 months
Plaque statistically significantly lower in the 4-month vs 12-month group (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973); favours 4-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
36 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment change between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 4 weeks (1 month)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
6 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment loss between the 2-week and 4-week scale and polish interval groups (Westfelt 1983).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 12 weeks (3 months)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
6 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment loss between the 2-week and 12-week scale and polish interval groups (Westfelt 1983).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 4 weeks (1 month) vs Routine scale and polish every 12 weeks (3 months)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
6 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment loss between the 4-week and 12-week scale and polish interval groups (Westfelt 1983).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish vs No scale and polish (no treatment)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
11 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
6 to 22 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Calculus
22 months · with OHI subgroup
MD 0.77 [0.63, 0.91]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
3 to 11 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval vs Scale and polish only in response to signs/symptoms of periodontal disease (variable interval by bacterial/DDFM test)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Probing depth
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Gingivitis
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded
Recurrent periodontitis
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Attachment level
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Plaque
6 to 48 months
no estimate extracted2 studiesUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (Lightner 1971 with OHI; Suomi 1973 no OHI).2 studiesUngraded
Calculus
24 to 48 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in 6-month vs 12-month group in Lightner 1971 (with OHI) at 24 months (not significant at 36, 48 months) and in Suomi 1973 (no OHI) at 36 months.2 studiesUngraded
Plaque
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in plaque between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals: Lightner 1971 (with OHI) at 24, 36 and 48 months; Suomi 1973 (no OHI) at 36 months.2 studiesUngraded
Pocket depth
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant difference in pocket depth between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
24 to 48 months
No statistically significant difference in attachment change between 6- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish with oral hygiene instruction (OHI) vs Routine scale and polish without OHI (same interval)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Calculus
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Plaque
12 to 48 months
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Attachment change
12 to 24 months
Attachment loss statistically significantly greater in the 6-month group than the 2-week group at 12 and 24 months; a gain in attachment was reported in the 2-week group (Nyman 1975).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
12 to 24 months
MD -1.60 [-1.81, -1.39]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
12 to 24 months
MD -1.40 [-1.68, -1.12]1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
12 to 24 months
MD -1.50 [-2.04, -0.96]1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 2 weeks vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pocket depth
24 months
MD -1.20 [-1.91, -0.49]1 studyUngraded
Plaque
24 months
MD -1.10 [-1.50, -0.70]1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
24 months
Attachment loss statistically significantly greater in the 12-month group than the 2-week group at 24 months; a gain in attachment was reported in the 2-week group (Rosling 1976).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
24 months
MD -1.40 [-1.80, -1.00]1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 3 months (with OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months (with OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Plaque
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in plaque between 3- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (with OHI) at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded
Calculus
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in calculus between 3- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (with OHI) at 12, 24, 36 or 48 months (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
12 to 48 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between the 3- and 6-month scale and polish (with OHI) interval groups at any time point (Lightner 1971).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 4 months (no OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 6 months (no OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gingivitis
36 months
No statistically significant differences in gingivitis between the 4- and 6-month scale and polish (no OHI) interval groups at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Calculus
36 months
No statistically significant differences in calculus between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
36 months
No statistically significant differences in pocket depth between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
36 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment change between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Plaque
36 months
No statistically significant difference in plaque between 4- and 6-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 3 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
24 to 48 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 24 and 48 months (not significant at 36 months); without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Plaque
24 to 48 months
Plaque statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 36 months (not significant at 24, 48 months); without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
24 to 48 months
Gingivitis statistically significantly lower in the 3-month vs 12-month group: with OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months; without OHI at 24, 36 and 48 months (Lightner 1971); favours 3-monthly.1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish every 4 months (no OHI) vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months (no OHI)

Population: Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
CD004625.PUB2 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Calculus
36 months
Calculus statistically significantly lower in the 4-month vs 12-month group (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973); favours 4-monthly.1 studyUngraded
Pocket depth
36 months
No statistically significant differences in pocket depth between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Attachment change
36 months
No statistically significant differences in attachment change between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Gingivitis
36 months
No statistically significant difference in gingivitis between 4- and 12-month scale and polish intervals (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973).1 studyUngraded
Plaque
36 months
Plaque statistically significantly lower in the 4-month vs 12-month group (no OHI) at 36 months (Suomi 1973); favours 4-monthly.1 studyUngraded

Routine scale and polish vs No scale and polish (no treatment)

Population: Adults over 18 years; periodontally healthy, plaque-induced gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis
CD004625 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish at a fixed interval vs Scale and polish only in response to signs/symptoms of periodontal disease (variable interval by bacterial/DDFM test)

Population: Adults over 18 years; periodontally healthy, plaque-induced gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis
CD004625 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish at a more frequent fixed interval vs Routine scale and polish at a less frequent fixed interval

Population: Adults over 18 years; periodontally healthy, plaque-induced gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis
CD004625 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs Routine scale and polish provided by a dental care professional (dental therapist or hygienist)

Population: Adults over 18 years; periodontally healthy, plaque-induced gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis
CD004625 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
At least 6 months (planned)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies